.
Feedback

Yucaipa Citizens Group Accuses County of 'Suppressing Public Participation'

The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has scheduled a hearing for Lazer Broadcasting's radio tower application on Nov. 27, five days after Thanksgiving, according to Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living.

A group of Yucaipa residents who oppose a commercial radio broadcast tower near Wildwood Canyon State Park claim the county Board of Supervisors is attempting to "suppress public participation" by scheduling a hearing about the tower five days after Thanksgiving.

"Public hearings that occur during the holiday season traditionally have very low public turnout," a Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living representative said Thursday.

"We have requested that the hearing be continued until after the holidays to ensure that more people will be able to attend. The County has yet to reply on that request."

Representatives of the company that wants to build the tower, Lazer Broadcasting, could not be reached for comment.

Lazer Broadcasting owns and operates 19 Spanish language radio stations in 10 California markets, plus one affiliated station in Lancaster, according to the company's website.

"Lazer Broadcasting programs the top rated Regional Mexican format known as 'Radio Lazer,' the Adults Hits known as 'La Mejor,' and the Traditional Mexican Ranchero known as 'La Mexicana,'" the website states.

The total Hispanic population within Lazer Broadcasting markets represents more than 2 million Hispanics, about 37 percent of the total population in those markets, according to Lazer Broadcasting.

Mark Edwards, a partner with the law firm Mirau, Edwards, Cannon, Lewin & Tooke, based in Redlands, said his firm represents Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living. John Mirau, lead partner in the firm, is the group's president.

"CPRL formed in 2008, to preserve open space," Edwards said Thursday in a phone interview. "This tower is of particular interest right now because of its proximity to Wildwood Canyon State Park.

"The fire danger is a concern, the destruction of vistas, construction of an unsightly tower in what is otherwise pristine open space," Edwards said.

More than 16,000 individuals in the Yucaipa area have signed petitions opposing the tower, Edwards said. Others have written letters to the Board of Supervisors and attended meetings, Edwards said.

Asked how many members Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living claim, Edwards said the group does not publicly disclose its membership.

Plans for the tower have been discussed at the county level since 2007, Edwards said. The current proposed height of the tower is 43 feet, he said.

"The Board of Supervisors first rejected the tower in 2009 and it has since gone through several revised applications to the present proposal," Edwards said.

The Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living bill themselves as "a coalition of San Bernardino County residents, elected officials, environmental advocacy groups and Wildwood Canyon State Park and Pisgah Peak wilderness recreational users."

The group's website states:

"The members of CPRL are opposed to the commercial development of Wildwood Canyon State Park and Pisgah Peak wilderness by the Oxnard, California based corporation Lazer Broadcasting, Inc."

Lazer has offices in Oxnard, Brawley, and Reno, Nevada, according to its website.

As of Thursday evening, the Lazer Broadcasting public hearing was still scheduled Nov. 27, Edwards said.

"A lot of voices will not be heard because of the date it's scheduled," he said.

According to Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living, the hearing is scheduled to begin 9 a.m. Tuesday Nov. 27 at 385 N. Arrowhead Ave., 1st Floor, San Bernardino.

For more information about Citizens for the Preservation of Rural Living visit www.stopthetowernow.org.

For more information about Lazer Broadcasting visit www.radiolazer.com.

Follow Banning-Beaumont Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here

Inside Informer November 16, 2012 at 12:58 pm
While I don't own property in the area, I certainly support those that do as this would be such an eye sore in an otherwise nice area. Yucaipa has already allowed too much residential build out over there, but for industrial projects to invade it would be even worse.
Judy Bingham November 16, 2012 at 04:32 pm
To a sister group, Beaumont Citizens for Responsible Growth, bcrg.org , urges you to continue to fight the good fight. Let us know if we can help. See www.beaumontgate.org Truly a David and Goliath story. We need to take our rural communities back.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has" Margaret Mead (1901-1978)
Guy McCarthy (Editor) November 16, 2012 at 08:25 pm
Here is an update: County Staff Will Not Recommend Rescheduling Radio Tower Hearing http://patch.com/A-z98R

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ken June 17, 2013 at 11:47 am
Great idea Lloyd..They dont deliver to the old neighborhoods I guess. I generally pay the 50 centsRead More to see what they DIDNT print.
Washy June 18, 2013 at 04:37 am
Have you tried calling them and asking them to not throw trash in your driveway each Friday.
Two4ac June 19, 2013 at 07:21 am
I've called them multiple times and asked them to stop littering my property. After the 4th time andRead More talking to the person in charge of distribution, they seem to have stopped.
Tracy Salinas June 18, 2013 at 11:25 am
UPDATE on CV (nickname)...a tumor protruding from his right eye was removed yesterday - he now canRead More close the eye completely which, coupled with a fly mask, will keep the flies from laying eggs in his eye (a very nasty thing indeed). He has settled in with a gentle geriatric horse for a companion and is eating well (his weight was not an issue before - he obviously was fed decently). His club hoof causes him quite a lot of discomfort, but he manages to hobble around. A visit from the farrier is nextin line, to see if his discomfort can be aleviated. I don't believe he will ever be a riding horse, but he casts a nice shadow and is gentle and kind to be around. There is a peacefulness that eminates from his very being...
Ellen Carr June 18, 2013 at 11:45 am
Okay, this isn't funny. I just posted a comment and it's gone. My first post was edited now myRead More second post disappears. What's going on?????
Ellen Carr June 18, 2013 at 10:48 pm
Good news. My post from 6/17 has reappeared but my post from this morning (6/18) hasn't surfacedRead More yet. I don't have a clue as to what is going on!
Aubreey we Love You!!!
Gina Tenorio (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Beautiful! Now this is great news! Thank you both so much for sharing the news of your blessing withRead More the rest of us.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Mccrary June 10, 2013 at 03:50 pm
THIS ADD WAS WRITTEN WRONG SORRY.LOL THE ONE ABOVE IT IS THE CORRECT ADD.
Courtesy of the U.S. Forest Service.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 10:59 am
Great photo, Julie... thanks for sharing!
Ben June 11, 2013 at 02:04 pm
Niki- yes the plans have been updated to allow Banning and Yucaipa to share in the use of the newRead More ponds. It is an inter-agency plan that is beneficial to everyone. Why you consider having other entities share this project, which bonds us all together: they are paying to help build the new area so we, as ratepayers aren't hit with the whole bill, and we are going to finally get some recycled water into use from Yucaipa, Banning gets new wells, and no matter what- we have ultimate control over the use at all times- how that is a horror story I can't figure out. These plans were in the works for years, it was no secret. Its now being finalized by the board- as the details are now ironed out. The only horror story I see happening is how Beaumont refuses to make an agreement with the district to utilize their recycled water- and its not all the water district's fault like you think. Beaumont can't build unless they find some new sources of water. One of the reasons they pulled out is once they update their wastewater facility- they don't plan on wasting that recycled water just on landscaping . They are going to dump it into the basin itself for the water credit. Beaumont residents have no clue that their drinking water will eventually be more wastewater than water coming down the mountain. Sorry- but I think Fraser is doing a great job. If he hadn't got in there, the district would belong to Beaumont, who would take all the water they want regardless of impact studies, and siphon off all the money for their own uses. Guess you missed their lawsuit in the courts- the courts laughed them out. Beaumont is broke. The water district is financially sound.
Niki Magee June 13, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Ben, it is unfortunate you are the victim of such serious misinformation. I thought I knew everyoneRead More at last night's BCVWD meeting. Who were you?
Claire Frémont June 15, 2013 at 09:59 am
I'm curious, Niki, what misinformation are you speaking of concerning Ben's comment? He appears toRead More be stating information that I've read about also. Beaumont did sue to try and take over the water district, they did get a cease and desist order to stop dumping their wastewater into the aquifer, and have pulled out of all negotiations with the district to supply them with recycled water. The district has made the arrangements instead with Yucaipa to take their water, with the hopes that someday Beaumont will come around. All these things are in agendas and downloads available to the public, which part are you disputing?