.
Feedback

From the City: A History of Water in Beaumont

The city touts its long water history, including $100.4 million in water projects it has completed in the last dozen years.

Editor's Note: The following article was submitted for publication by the city of Beaumont.  Text by: Steve Moore.  Photos by: Rodrigo Pena.

Working together for water

More than a century ago, Beaumont farmers irrigated their crops with stream water.

Today, our water comes from a vast, computerized network of pipelines, pumps, and reservoirs.

Over the decades, these advances in water delivery have helped create a thriving, dynamic city of nearly 40,000 people. It’s our way of helping assure growth and prosperity for our hometown and protecting and enhancing the Beaumont Basin.

“The future possibilities of our Basin are almost limitless,” says Councilman Brian De Forge. “And by all of us working together, generations to come will be able to enjoy plentiful, high-quality and affordable water.”

Close ties

Working closely with the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District, the city of Beaumont has spent more than $100 million on water projects. This partnership has produced many new improvements that will brighten our future. (Developers pay fees to build public improvements under the city’s pioneering Community Facilities Districts program.)

Water lines now run under bustling Interstate 10 and lured the Beaumont Marketplace, Wal-Mart and Home Depot to town.  Strategic, new reservoirs can store 16.75 million gallons of water. Recycled water will soon keep our golf courses green to save precious groundwater.

Water projects

Since 2000, the Community Facilities Districts program has built the following projects:

  • Transmission lines: $24.4 million
  • Reservoirs: $23 million
  • Spreading ponds and water conservation projects: $16.8 million
  • Well upgrades (Palm Avenue): $12.5 million
  • Monitoring wells/water recycling projects: $2.5 million
  • Wastewater treatment plant expansion and upgrading, water recycling, and storm drains: $21.2 million

Total: $100.4 million

 The future

This forward-looking city always searches for opportunities to create a better tomorrow. And by working together, Beaumont can help advance the cause of water—just like our pioneering forefathers did.

Beaumont believes the private sector and local government can team up and serve the public interest when it comes to water.

“Beaumont’s inspired way of doing public improvements shows how builders and local government, working cooperatively, can improve everyday life,” said Mayor Roger Berg.

Beaumont’s Water History

  • 1887: Southern California Investment Co. subdivides Beaumont and Cherry Valley.
  • 1907: The Beaumont Land and Water Co. is formed and farmers divert stream water for their crops.
  • 1919: The Beaumont Irrigation District is formed and wells are drilled in Edgar Canyon.
  • 1935: The first wells are sunk in the Beaumont Basin.
  • 1961: The San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency is formed to bring State Project water to the area.
  • 1970: The Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District is formed.
  • 1993: The Community Facilities Districts program is created in Beaumont.
  • 1994: The city’s wastewater treatment plant is expanded and upgraded.
  • 2002: The first imported state water arrives by pipeline to the Beaumont Basin.
  • 2004: Water rights are established for the first time for major users under a process called adjudication.
  • 2012: Beaumont and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians sign an agreement where the tribe will store state water in the Beaumont Basin.

Mayor Pro tem David Castaldo has become the city’s “water ambassador,” working hand-in-hand with the Beaumont-Cherry Valley Water District and the San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency.

“In Beaumont, we look for solutions and work together for the common good,” he said. “And just like previous generations, we’re good stewards of water.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Lloyd White May 19, 2013 at 05:31 pm
James, I couldn't agree more. My posts on the old format generated many more comments than with theRead More new format. Sometimes my posts wouldn't make it to the front page and no one saw them until I asked the editor to move them to the blog column. Now they get lost in the news column and they drop off faster. Newcomers to the patch won't know whose blogs to go and check out. I hope the patch will find away to return the focus to the blogs, you are right there is no difference from the newspaper sites now.
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:12 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRxJrtmGPbg Join us! http://on.fb.me/ZUxe3o Find cities alreadyRead More participating: http://bit.ly/ZTDsk8
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Join us for the March! We will have picket signs that clearly state our different perspectives. WeRead More will have brochures that explain the cause. Distributing fliers before the march is a HUGE part of this. Please tell your neighbors about this... www.march-against-monsanto.com
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:14 pm
Thanks for sharing, Tina!
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah