.
Feedback

Caltrans Making Moves to Ease 10 Freeway Gridlock

The changeable message signs were erected over I-10 just east of Blythe and just east of Desert Center.

Efforts by state and county officials to prevent -- or at least lessen the impact of -- traffic jams on Interstate 10 between Beaumont and Blythe are moving ahead, with Caltrans announcing today the installation of new electronic message signs on the heavily traveled corridor.

"Changeable Message Signs will allow us to deliver information directly to the drivers before they encounter large traffic back-ups," said Caltrans District 8 Director Basem Muallem. "Motorists will be able to take an alternate route to avoid long delays."


According to Caltrans, the signs were erected over I-10 just east of Blythe and just east of Desert Center.

Crews have also installed 61 vehicle detection systems covering the entire roughly 133-mile stretch of freeway between Banning and Blythe, Caltrans officials said.

The detection systems monitor speed and traffic volume, processing the data and posting it on the the freeway message signs to give motorists' real- time estimates on how long it will take to travel a route.

The total cost of the systems and signs was just over $2.1 million, according to Caltrans.

The freeway additions were made as part of the state's obligations under the "Interstate 10 Lifeline Emergency Action Plan," which Riverside County is directing.

The Board of Supervisors unanimously agreed in October to partner with the state and tribal governments on implementing the plan, inspired by a series of massive traffic jams on I-10 that left motorists' stranded in the last several years, most recently on Feb. 12, 2012.

A 20-mile backup occurred that day on the westbound side of the freeway approaching Banning when a Caltrans crew closed two lanes during a pavement replacement project. Some motorists were delayed up to seven hours.

Then-Caltrans District 8 Director Ray Wolfe blamed the fiasco on underlings who had -- without his authorization -- given a private contractor permission to extend an overnight closure into the morning hours.

The county's part of the action plan focuses mainly on making improvements on a 19-mile stretch of I-10 through the San Gorgonio Pass, an area that lacks readily accessible detour routes, including frontage roads, that would permit drivers to exit the interstate and continue in either direction in the event of a closure.

A bypass is planned, possibly using Morongo Band of Mission Indians' reservation land, in the next five years.

Caltrans spokeswoman Terri Kasinga said the detection systems' project had been under way since before last February's crunch, but state officials expedited it to meet the action plan goals.

"We are very pleased to see Caltrans move ahead with their pieces of the plan," said Juan Perez, director of the county's Transportation and Land Management Agency. "The traveler information projects will be completed by the end of this year with the larger freeway bypass projects coming later."

Ern Batavia January 26, 2013 at 10:36 pm
Money to blow....traffic "warning" signs in the middle of nowhere - 'tween Desert Center and Blythe for crying out loud?
Sheesh.....the democrats sure know how to blow your bucks.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lloyd White June 17, 2013 at 10:41 am
I find it interesting the RG was all over the State of the City luncheon but not interested inRead More printing the questions and issues raised by the Mayor's unsubstantiated claims. We should stop paying any attention to the RG if they aren't interested in what's really happening in Beaumont. I don't subscribe to the RG but it is still delivered to my house every week. Does anyone know how to stop the delivery? I could just pick it up each week and throw it in the trash but then their circulation won't be accurately represented to their advertisers. I'm going to start asking local business to stop advertising in the RG.
Ken June 17, 2013 at 11:47 am
Great idea Lloyd..They dont deliver to the old neighborhoods I guess. I generally pay the 50 centsRead More to see what they DIDNT print.
Washy June 18, 2013 at 04:37 am
Have you tried calling them and asking them to not throw trash in your driveway each Friday.
Tracy Salinas June 18, 2013 at 11:17 am
@Get Mobiled - NO animal should be LEFT or DUMPED anywhere...AGAIN...the owner's lack ofRead More responsibilty and accountability. Yes, times are tough. No, I do not know the exact circumstances. But this horse was FIRSt - let loose on the streets, SECOND - caught and tied to the front of the feed store. Why is the horse THEIR problem? Why is he now MY problem? BECAUSE, my son (an employee of the feed store) believes is RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY, as do I and his father. We took this horse in, not because we needed it (or wanted it) but because it was the RIGHT THING TO DO. THE WRONG THING TO DO was to let it loose in the first place - there are other avenues which could have been taken.
Tracy Salinas June 18, 2013 at 11:25 am
UPDATE on CV (nickname)...a tumor protruding from his right eye was removed yesterday - he now canRead More close the eye completely which, coupled with a fly mask, will keep the flies from laying eggs in his eye (a very nasty thing indeed). He has settled in with a gentle geriatric horse for a companion and is eating well (his weight was not an issue before - he obviously was fed decently). His club hoof causes him quite a lot of discomfort, but he manages to hobble around. A visit from the farrier is nextin line, to see if his discomfort can be aleviated. I don't believe he will ever be a riding horse, but he casts a nice shadow and is gentle and kind to be around. There is a peacefulness that eminates from his very being...
Ellen Carr June 18, 2013 at 11:45 am
Okay, this isn't funny. I just posted a comment and it's gone. My first post was edited now myRead More second post disappears. What's going on?????
Aubreey we Love You!!!
Gina Tenorio (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Beautiful! Now this is great news! Thank you both so much for sharing the news of your blessing withRead More the rest of us.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Mccrary June 10, 2013 at 03:50 pm
THIS ADD WAS WRITTEN WRONG SORRY.LOL THE ONE ABOVE IT IS THE CORRECT ADD.
Courtesy of the U.S. Forest Service.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 10:59 am
Great photo, Julie... thanks for sharing!
Ben June 11, 2013 at 02:04 pm
Niki- yes the plans have been updated to allow Banning and Yucaipa to share in the use of the newRead More ponds. It is an inter-agency plan that is beneficial to everyone. Why you consider having other entities share this project, which bonds us all together: they are paying to help build the new area so we, as ratepayers aren't hit with the whole bill, and we are going to finally get some recycled water into use from Yucaipa, Banning gets new wells, and no matter what- we have ultimate control over the use at all times- how that is a horror story I can't figure out. These plans were in the works for years, it was no secret. Its now being finalized by the board- as the details are now ironed out. The only horror story I see happening is how Beaumont refuses to make an agreement with the district to utilize their recycled water- and its not all the water district's fault like you think. Beaumont can't build unless they find some new sources of water. One of the reasons they pulled out is once they update their wastewater facility- they don't plan on wasting that recycled water just on landscaping . They are going to dump it into the basin itself for the water credit. Beaumont residents have no clue that their drinking water will eventually be more wastewater than water coming down the mountain. Sorry- but I think Fraser is doing a great job. If he hadn't got in there, the district would belong to Beaumont, who would take all the water they want regardless of impact studies, and siphon off all the money for their own uses. Guess you missed their lawsuit in the courts- the courts laughed them out. Beaumont is broke. The water district is financially sound.
Niki Magee June 13, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Ben, it is unfortunate you are the victim of such serious misinformation. I thought I knew everyoneRead More at last night's BCVWD meeting. Who were you?
Claire Frémont June 15, 2013 at 09:59 am
I'm curious, Niki, what misinformation are you speaking of concerning Ben's comment? He appears toRead More be stating information that I've read about also. Beaumont did sue to try and take over the water district, they did get a cease and desist order to stop dumping their wastewater into the aquifer, and have pulled out of all negotiations with the district to supply them with recycled water. The district has made the arrangements instead with Yucaipa to take their water, with the hopes that someday Beaumont will come around. All these things are in agendas and downloads available to the public, which part are you disputing?