.
Feedback

SWAT Team Shoots, Kills Man in Beaumont Standoff

Police tell Banning-Beaumont Patch that a 38-year-old Beaumont man was killed in the confrontation with law enforcement after he tried to force his way into his home where his wife and baby were hiding.

Editor's note/update:  The coroner's office has now identified the man shot and killed during Monday's incident.

Original story as follows:

BEAUMONT, CA -- A multi-agency response to a call of a "barricaded subject" at a Beaumont home Monday ended in the deadly shooting of the suspect, officials report.

The man's wife and a baby who were inside the home are unharmed, police say.

"The initial call was that this man was trying to kill his wife," according to Riverside Sheriff's Deputy Albert Martinez, whose agency has taken on a lead role in the investigation. 

The incident first began around 9 a.m. in a Beaumont neighborhood about two miles west of Beaumont High School.

It all started when a woman called the Beaumont Police Department for help, saying that she believed her husband was going to kill her.  Police responded, and found the man locked out of the home on the 1700 block of Morgan Avenue, south of Brookside Avenue, according to Martinez.

"As they responded an officer did see the subject which matched the description of the person in question," he said.  "While he was making contact with this person, this person went into the garage of the residence of the female who called lives at."

"As the gentleman went back into his residence, in the garage area, the Beaumont police department had him in sight there," he added.  "At that time, we knew that the female was possibly inside the residence with her baby.  There were several attempts that were made in calling that resident; all we would get is someone hanging up."

[RELATED:  ]

Police first tried to coax the man out "who wasn't obeying the officers' commands" by sending in a California Highway Patrol K-9, Martinez said.  That K-9, "Ranger," was shot, according to Martinez and CHP Officer Darren Meyer.

"At that point, once the K-9 was inside the garage, there was one gunshot that was heard, and the K-9 was hit by the suspect," Martinez added.

When the SWAT team, who had responded in the meantime, heard the the shot around 12:30 p.m. that wounded the canine, they saw the man with the gun-- who was at that point trying to force his way into the locked home via the garage entrance, Martinez said.

"The SWAT officers came and assisted Beaumont and they took a position where they could see the suspect, and they could clearly see that the officer was armed," Martinez said.  "At one point the suspect began breaking the door that goes between the garage to the inside of the residence, and at that time, the officers fired and struck the suspect."

The man died a short time later at the scene, according to Martinez.

The man, who has only been identified as a 38-year-old Beaumont resident, was found with a gun, Martinez added.

"'Ranger' has been taken to the local veterinary clinic here in Beaumont, and the prognosis is good," CHP Officer Meyer said.

The 2 1/2 year-old Dutch Shepard has been Officer Brice Murille's partner for the last year, he added.

"Whether he'll return to work is unknown," Meyer said, adding that many of the CHP officers had gathered at the clinic "hoping for a good recovery."

Beaumont police tell Patch that they've responded to calls at this location before, but never for anything criminal.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Claire Frémont May 20, 2013 at 11:00 am
I think you are a very nice man, Jeremiah, and you are most certainly not stupid. People whoRead More misspell words like "you're" while calling others stupid- now that might qualify.
ATC May 20, 2013 at 10:33 am
BTW, Victor, (ironically) your final insult to Jeremiah should read "I think you'reRead More STUPID", not "I think your STUPID". :)
ATC May 20, 2013 at 10:25 am
Wow, Victor, what an assinine response to a valid comment by Jeremiah. Just because you love theRead More new layout, doesn't mean that others do, nor that we are stupid or somehow need training to use it. The larger number/real estate of the ads is not the issue, the issue is the "flow" of the relevant info/articles. As has been said by a number of others; the new layout mixes blogs and news together, meaning that both drop off the page sooner, regardless of how many are commenting on it. Your answer to post an "announcement" with a link to direct people back to that blog? Why add steps/links when it shouldn't be necessary? That's like a highway sign telling you to look for the next sign for the info that should be on the first sign. And the "linear only" comment threading is also contradictory to "flow". Yes, advertisers pay for these sites, but driving locals away do the sites (and advertisers) a disservice. The entire point of the Patch sites is mainly for locals to converse about local issues in a way that facilitates ease of communication. The new layout does the opposite. You refer to the "old site's "at a glance" one could see the topics and conversation participants with a quick glance of the homepage." And that's exactly the point. At a glance. I'm not sure why that concept has a negative connotation to you, but those of us who think otherwise are not "stupid", although you prove yourself to be just that by making that accusation. So you like the new layout. Good for you. We don't. In your mind that makes you brilliant and us stupid? You've certainly illuminated your own intelligence with that comment. Now go ahead and fire away at me too, proving your point (or ours?) even further.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Lloyd White May 19, 2013 at 05:31 pm
James, I couldn't agree more. My posts on the old format generated many more comments than with theRead More new format. Sometimes my posts wouldn't make it to the front page and no one saw them until I asked the editor to move them to the blog column. Now they get lost in the news column and they drop off faster. Newcomers to the patch won't know whose blogs to go and check out. I hope the patch will find away to return the focus to the blogs, you are right there is no difference from the newspaper sites now.
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:12 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRxJrtmGPbg Join us! http://on.fb.me/ZUxe3o Find cities alreadyRead More participating: http://bit.ly/ZTDsk8
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Join us for the March! We will have picket signs that clearly state our different perspectives. WeRead More will have brochures that explain the cause. Distributing fliers before the march is a HUGE part of this. Please tell your neighbors about this... www.march-against-monsanto.com
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 16, 2013 at 02:14 pm
Thanks for sharing, Tina!
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah