.
Feedback

UPDATE: Outage Caused by Equipment Failure 'On Pole Near Banning Airport'

Power was restored to more than 17,000 customers in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater just before p.m. Dec. 11, according to utility officials.

Update 5:31 p.m. The cause of outages that left more than 17,000 customers without power in the San Gorgonio Pass for several hours Tuesday afternoon stemmed from a piece of equipment that failed on a pole in the vicinity of Banning Municipal Airport, a Southern California Edison spokeswoman said.

The outages coincided with a major transmission failure in Banning that caused two fires, and a vegetation fire next to Interstate 10 in Beaumont, according to Edison and Cal Fire officials.

Susan Cox, an Edison spokeswoman, said power was restored to more than 17,000 customers affected in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater as of 2:59 p.m. Dec. 11.

Cox said Tuesday evening she was not sure if the equipment failure on the pole near Banning Municipal Airport sparked any fires.

Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines told Banning-Beasumont Patch there was "a major transmission failure in Banning" that caused two fires at the same time as the vegetation fire near a power line area in Beaumont.

The street address for Banning Municipal Airport is 600 S. Hathaway St., Banning, east of Hargrave and south of Interstate 10.

Update 4:01 p.m. A Cal Fire division chief said Tuesday afternoon there was "a major transmission failure in Banning" that caused two fires at the same time as the vegetation fire near a power line area in Beaumont.

"We're not sure if it's a coincidence or if the incident on Hathaway in Banning also caused this fire here in Beaumont," Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines said in a video interview with Banning-Beaumont Patch.

The video is attached to this report.

Update 3:21 p.m. Some residents of Beaumont, Banning and Cabazon reported their electricity had been restored as of 3 p.m. Tuesday.

Susan Cox, an Edison spokeswoman, said power was restored to more than 17,000 customers affected in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater as of 2:59 p.m. Dec. 11.

"The outage was reported at 12:15 p.m. this afternoon," Cox said in a phone interview. "At the time it had impacted 17,239 customers in Banning, Beaumont, Cabazon, Cherry Valley and Whitewater. Power was partially restored to 2,179 customers at around 1:26 p.m."

The cause of the outages was under investigation, Cox said.

Update 3:01 p.m. The fire next to westbound Interstate 10 in Beaumont burned about 600 feet of trees and damaged a trailer and a Caltrans barrier next to the freeway, a Cal Fire division chief said at the scene.

The fire also resulted in exterior smoke damage to the Beaumont Tire Shop and America's Best Value Inn, said Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines, who is based in Banning.

Traffic signals were still out in Beaumont before 3 p.m.

There was no immediate update from Southern California Edison, who told Banning-Beaumont Patch before 2 p.m. that 17,400 customers were without power from Beaumont to Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater due to a substation damaged in the vegetation fire.

Posted 2:01 p.m. A fire scorched eucalyptus and pine trees next to westbound Interstate 10 Tuesday afternoon in Beaumont, damaged a utility substation, and left 17,400 customers without power in the San Gorgonio Pass.

Customers from Beaumont to Banning, Cabazon and the Whitewater area were among those without electricity due to the substation damaged in the vegetation fire, a Southern California Edison spokeswoman told Banning-Beaumont Patch.

The fire was reported at 12:04 p.m. on the westbound 10 east of Beaumont Avenue, according to Cal Fire. It was contained one hour and five minutes later, but not before the substation was damaged, according to Cal Fire and Edison officials.

"First arriving engine company reported a brush fire on the right hand shoulder of the freeway, approximately 600 feet of eucalyptus and pine trees, requiring heavy mop up," Melody Hendrickson of Cal Fire said in a statement.

Westbound 10 lanes were closed for a time. As of 1:45 p.m., one westbound lane and the offramp at Beaumont Avenue remained closed, according to the California Highway Patrol.

Follow Banning-Beaumont Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Victor S Dominguez May 22, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Good to see you on Patch Paul. sometimes I forget you have a handicap you get more done than 90% ofRead More the people I know. I hope to see you one day soon, like our old days rolling around in the Van!
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
ATC May 22, 2013 at 07:26 am
And now it's back!?!? Wow, this "great new format" is really impressive, eh? And ofRead More course the one thing that many have wanted, many have asked for, the one thing that would have been easy to add; the ability for a person to edit their post, is still nowhere to be found. We must delete the entire post and rewrite it if we make a typo. Yeah, that's logical. Patch Powers that be: Please listen to your readership. Bring back the ability to comment on specific comments (not just at the end), bring back the "latest comments" section on the front page (so readers can see what's hot/active at a glance), and for crying out loud, add the ability to edit our posts (it's not really rocket science here, people). Those three things would likely eliminate 90% of the complaints about this new format. Of course, I'm not about to hold my breath. I don't think they really care, nor really listen.
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 01:18 pm
And the new "fornmat" continues to disappoint. Of course Victor deleted his insultingRead More response to Jeremiah, but then the powers that be deleted my lengthy response to Victor, which also had a number of salient points regarding Jeremiah's post. Seems the "censorship" is a bit more zealous with this new format, eh? Oh well, I predict a major decrease in the local voices that made the Patch one of the "go to" sites for local information, commentary, and debate. Sad, really, as I learned a significant amount of info about my community here in the past. No more, obviously.
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Steve, I was not aware of the lecture until the earlier post. Like you, I am learning the new siteRead More and how to navigate it. I was trying the new tools, Willie Boy was the topic of input, no agenda. So yes in the future I will have more meat and less potatoes :}
steve l May 21, 2013 at 12:02 pm
so this was a commercial for the lecture? i really didnt know, what with the new format, if i justRead More wasnt finding the article. i would have preferred some sort of story.
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 11:56 am
James, it got you to talk about it. Now look, information was shared and more people are aware ofRead More the speaking event on June 15. Not bad for just posting a picture. I wonder how many people googled more information as well just from this picture. James thanks for your input, it`s people like you that make me relevant ;]
Washy May 22, 2013 at 04:38 pm
hey go to your right and click the green feedback tab and tell them what you think.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
March Against Monsanto official communication........... I would like to say that I am beyondRead More honored to be a part of this. It's really amazing to see people—of all ages, from different cultures, all walks of life, different belief systems, etc.—working together as One, for the shared goal of protecting Earth and everything that Earth includes: Humans, Animals, Plants... This is a critical issue of our time and I am blessed to be a part of something that will go down in history for changing the world for the better (or, as I also like to refer to it, readjusting and returning to our truth, which among other things includes seeing the interconnectedness of things and working *with* Nature). A thought came to my mind yesterday: I'm sure you've heard that many countries already have bans and restrictions on GMOs and what Monsanto can/can't do. Yet, take a look at the Event List. You'll see the very same countries listed as participants of this March. Many people from countries that already have bans will be participating in this March along with the rest of us who aren't in that place yet [of Bans and Restrictions on Monsanto's atrocities]. They, just like the rest of us, are taking time out of their routines and schedules, putting other things on the back burner and putting in the work and effort, to take a stand, to stand together. Thank you for organizing, participating, marching... Thank you. .........Admn. for March Against Monsanto http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 04:01 pm
On the contrary, evidence presented in this report indicates that GM crops: ● Are laboratory-made,Read More using technology that is totally different from natural breeding methods, and pose different risks from non-GM crops ● Can be toxic, allergenic or less nutritious than their natural counterparts ● Are not adequately regulated to ensure safety ● Do not increase yield potential ● Do not reduce pesticide use but increase it ● Create serious problems for farmers, including herbicide-tolerant “superweeds”, compromised soil quality, and increased disease susceptibility in crops ● Have mixed economic effects ● Harm soil quality, disrupts ecosystems, and reduces biodiversity ● Do not offer effective solutions to climate change ● Are as energy-hungry as any other chemically-farmed crops ● Cannot solve the problem of world hunger but distract from its real causes – poverty, lack of access to food and, increasingly, lack of access to land to grow it on. Based on the evidence presented in this report, there is no need to take risks with GM crops when effective, readily available, and sustainable solutions to the problems that GM technology is claimed to address already exist. Conventional plant breeding, in some cases helped by safe modern technologies like gene mapping and marker assisted selection, continues to outperform GM in producing high-yield, drought-tolerant, and pest- and disease-resistant crops that can meet our present and future food needs. Conduct your own research to form your own opinion instead of repeating hear-say.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 03:59 pm
MYTH ABOUT GMO/MONSANTO……… Genetically modified (GM) crops are promoted on theRead More basis of a range of far-reaching claims from the GM crop industry and its supporters. They say that GM crops: ● Are an extension of natural breeding and do not pose different risks from naturally bred crops ● Are safe to eat and can be more nutritious than naturally bred crops ● Are strictly regulated for safety ● Increase crop yields ● Reduce pesticide use ● Benefit farmers and make their lives easier ● Bring economic benefits ● Benefit the environment ● Can help solve problems caused by climate change ● Reduce energy use ● Will help feed the world. However, a large and growing body of scientific and other authoritative evidence shows that these claims are NOT TRUE!
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
Seriously? An article claiming St. Patrick's Day is fast approaching...posted nearly 2 months AFTERRead More St. Patrick's Day? Yup, another home run by the Patch's new format!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)