.
Feedback

UPDATE: Outage Caused by Equipment Failure 'On Pole Near Banning Airport'

Power was restored to more than 17,000 customers in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater just before p.m. Dec. 11, according to utility officials.

Update 5:31 p.m. The cause of outages that left more than 17,000 customers without power in the San Gorgonio Pass for several hours Tuesday afternoon stemmed from a piece of equipment that failed on a pole in the vicinity of Banning Municipal Airport, a Southern California Edison spokeswoman said.

The outages coincided with a major transmission failure in Banning that caused two fires, and a vegetation fire next to Interstate 10 in Beaumont, according to Edison and Cal Fire officials.

Susan Cox, an Edison spokeswoman, said power was restored to more than 17,000 customers affected in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater as of 2:59 p.m. Dec. 11.

Cox said Tuesday evening she was not sure if the equipment failure on the pole near Banning Municipal Airport sparked any fires.

Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines told Banning-Beasumont Patch there was "a major transmission failure in Banning" that caused two fires at the same time as the vegetation fire near a power line area in Beaumont.

The street address for Banning Municipal Airport is 600 S. Hathaway St., Banning, east of Hargrave and south of Interstate 10.

Update 4:01 p.m. A Cal Fire division chief said Tuesday afternoon there was "a major transmission failure in Banning" that caused two fires at the same time as the vegetation fire near a power line area in Beaumont.

"We're not sure if it's a coincidence or if the incident on Hathaway in Banning also caused this fire here in Beaumont," Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines said in a video interview with Banning-Beaumont Patch.

The video is attached to this report.

Update 3:21 p.m. Some residents of Beaumont, Banning and Cabazon reported their electricity had been restored as of 3 p.m. Tuesday.

Susan Cox, an Edison spokeswoman, said power was restored to more than 17,000 customers affected in Beaumont, Cherry Valley, Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater as of 2:59 p.m. Dec. 11.

"The outage was reported at 12:15 p.m. this afternoon," Cox said in a phone interview. "At the time it had impacted 17,239 customers in Banning, Beaumont, Cabazon, Cherry Valley and Whitewater. Power was partially restored to 2,179 customers at around 1:26 p.m."

The cause of the outages was under investigation, Cox said.

Update 3:01 p.m. The fire next to westbound Interstate 10 in Beaumont burned about 600 feet of trees and damaged a trailer and a Caltrans barrier next to the freeway, a Cal Fire division chief said at the scene.

The fire also resulted in exterior smoke damage to the Beaumont Tire Shop and America's Best Value Inn, said Cal Fire Division Chief Kevin Gaines, who is based in Banning.

Traffic signals were still out in Beaumont before 3 p.m.

There was no immediate update from Southern California Edison, who told Banning-Beaumont Patch before 2 p.m. that 17,400 customers were without power from Beaumont to Banning, Cabazon and Whitewater due to a substation damaged in the vegetation fire.

Posted 2:01 p.m. A fire scorched eucalyptus and pine trees next to westbound Interstate 10 Tuesday afternoon in Beaumont, damaged a utility substation, and left 17,400 customers without power in the San Gorgonio Pass.

Customers from Beaumont to Banning, Cabazon and the Whitewater area were among those without electricity due to the substation damaged in the vegetation fire, a Southern California Edison spokeswoman told Banning-Beaumont Patch.

The fire was reported at 12:04 p.m. on the westbound 10 east of Beaumont Avenue, according to Cal Fire. It was contained one hour and five minutes later, but not before the substation was damaged, according to Cal Fire and Edison officials.

"First arriving engine company reported a brush fire on the right hand shoulder of the freeway, approximately 600 feet of eucalyptus and pine trees, requiring heavy mop up," Melody Hendrickson of Cal Fire said in a statement.

Westbound 10 lanes were closed for a time. As of 1:45 p.m., one westbound lane and the offramp at Beaumont Avenue remained closed, according to the California Highway Patrol.

Follow Banning-Beaumont Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here.

Laura P December 11, 2012 at 07:07 pm
Is there any news yet on when power will be restored?
Debbie adkins December 11, 2012 at 07:13 pm
I read online they said between 5-6-pmi
Sara Jerome December 11, 2012 at 08:03 pm
It's back on in The New House neighborhood.
Gail Paparian December 11, 2012 at 08:12 pm
Power has returned, at least to my part of Sun Lakes. (3:07 pm)
calimesajim December 11, 2012 at 08:24 pm
Strange! I contacted Edison twice and was told twice, once by a supervisor, that there was absolutely NO power outage in this area. The second customer service representative was also very RUDE and not at all helpful. This was around 2:30 p.m. so they should have had some information.
ZEN Japanese Thai Cuisine December 11, 2012 at 08:29 pm
At ZEN we got our power back too. I wonder why all T-mobile phones stopped working during the power outage?
Greg M December 11, 2012 at 09:09 pm
More than likely because the cell tower lost power too.
Carla December 11, 2012 at 09:46 pm
I have T-mobile and was not able to make or recieve any calls. Makes me wonder if I should switch to a more reliable company, as what would happen during an emergency.
Guy McCarthy (Editor) December 11, 2012 at 10:25 pm
For anyone curious about power at San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital during the outages, a spokeswoman there released a statement: Emergency Generator Worked as Intended at San Gorgonio Hospital During Outage http://patch.com/A-0pG2
L & R December 11, 2012 at 10:52 pm
Thank you Guy. We were visiting the hospital today, they were running as smoothly as usual. They gave flash lights to guests visiting rooms with patients. The nursing group kept us updated throughout the outage. I really never felt it during my visit. We prepared to leave when the lights came back on and employees were collecting flashlights and thanking us for bring patient. My mom and all of us were better off in the hospital than on the crazy ads without working traffic lights. Thank you San Gorgonio for making us comfortable and not bothered by the emergency. Race & Lindy
Ken December 12, 2012 at 04:54 pm
Funny no mention of the linemen working on the power lines on Maple...Just a couple hundred ft away...
Mariana Zuelsdorf December 13, 2012 at 01:19 am
Poor Banning, thrown under the bus for causing a fire in Beaumont. CAL FIRE Incidence report doesn't mention any fire/fires in Banning, on Dec 11.
steve December 14, 2012 at 03:37 pm
So, we here in Banning are paying dearly for our utilities now and we get our electric from Edison?? The city utility rates are second highest in the state, we get our electric from Edison but we pay more for it than Edison customers pay... What needs to happen to take the city of out of the mix. Why should we pay more than others for the same source of power???

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lloyd White June 17, 2013 at 10:41 am
I find it interesting the RG was all over the State of the City luncheon but not interested inRead More printing the questions and issues raised by the Mayor's unsubstantiated claims. We should stop paying any attention to the RG if they aren't interested in what's really happening in Beaumont. I don't subscribe to the RG but it is still delivered to my house every week. Does anyone know how to stop the delivery? I could just pick it up each week and throw it in the trash but then their circulation won't be accurately represented to their advertisers. I'm going to start asking local business to stop advertising in the RG.
Ken June 17, 2013 at 11:47 am
Great idea Lloyd..They dont deliver to the old neighborhoods I guess. I generally pay the 50 centsRead More to see what they DIDNT print.
Washy June 18, 2013 at 04:37 am
Have you tried calling them and asking them to not throw trash in your driveway each Friday.
Tracy Salinas June 18, 2013 at 11:17 am
@Get Mobiled - NO animal should be LEFT or DUMPED anywhere...AGAIN...the owner's lack ofRead More responsibilty and accountability. Yes, times are tough. No, I do not know the exact circumstances. But this horse was FIRSt - let loose on the streets, SECOND - caught and tied to the front of the feed store. Why is the horse THEIR problem? Why is he now MY problem? BECAUSE, my son (an employee of the feed store) believes is RESPONSIBILITY and ACCOUNTABILITY, as do I and his father. We took this horse in, not because we needed it (or wanted it) but because it was the RIGHT THING TO DO. THE WRONG THING TO DO was to let it loose in the first place - there are other avenues which could have been taken.
Tracy Salinas June 18, 2013 at 11:25 am
UPDATE on CV (nickname)...a tumor protruding from his right eye was removed yesterday - he now canRead More close the eye completely which, coupled with a fly mask, will keep the flies from laying eggs in his eye (a very nasty thing indeed). He has settled in with a gentle geriatric horse for a companion and is eating well (his weight was not an issue before - he obviously was fed decently). His club hoof causes him quite a lot of discomfort, but he manages to hobble around. A visit from the farrier is nextin line, to see if his discomfort can be aleviated. I don't believe he will ever be a riding horse, but he casts a nice shadow and is gentle and kind to be around. There is a peacefulness that eminates from his very being...
Ellen Carr June 18, 2013 at 11:45 am
Okay, this isn't funny. I just posted a comment and it's gone. My first post was edited now myRead More second post disappears. What's going on?????
Aubreey we Love You!!!
Gina Tenorio (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Beautiful! Now this is great news! Thank you both so much for sharing the news of your blessing withRead More the rest of us.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Mccrary June 10, 2013 at 03:50 pm
THIS ADD WAS WRITTEN WRONG SORRY.LOL THE ONE ABOVE IT IS THE CORRECT ADD.
Courtesy of the U.S. Forest Service.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 10:59 am
Great photo, Julie... thanks for sharing!
Ben June 11, 2013 at 02:04 pm
Niki- yes the plans have been updated to allow Banning and Yucaipa to share in the use of the newRead More ponds. It is an inter-agency plan that is beneficial to everyone. Why you consider having other entities share this project, which bonds us all together: they are paying to help build the new area so we, as ratepayers aren't hit with the whole bill, and we are going to finally get some recycled water into use from Yucaipa, Banning gets new wells, and no matter what- we have ultimate control over the use at all times- how that is a horror story I can't figure out. These plans were in the works for years, it was no secret. Its now being finalized by the board- as the details are now ironed out. The only horror story I see happening is how Beaumont refuses to make an agreement with the district to utilize their recycled water- and its not all the water district's fault like you think. Beaumont can't build unless they find some new sources of water. One of the reasons they pulled out is once they update their wastewater facility- they don't plan on wasting that recycled water just on landscaping . They are going to dump it into the basin itself for the water credit. Beaumont residents have no clue that their drinking water will eventually be more wastewater than water coming down the mountain. Sorry- but I think Fraser is doing a great job. If he hadn't got in there, the district would belong to Beaumont, who would take all the water they want regardless of impact studies, and siphon off all the money for their own uses. Guess you missed their lawsuit in the courts- the courts laughed them out. Beaumont is broke. The water district is financially sound.
Niki Magee June 13, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Ben, it is unfortunate you are the victim of such serious misinformation. I thought I knew everyoneRead More at last night's BCVWD meeting. Who were you?
Claire Frémont June 15, 2013 at 09:59 am
I'm curious, Niki, what misinformation are you speaking of concerning Ben's comment? He appears toRead More be stating information that I've read about also. Beaumont did sue to try and take over the water district, they did get a cease and desist order to stop dumping their wastewater into the aquifer, and have pulled out of all negotiations with the district to supply them with recycled water. The district has made the arrangements instead with Yucaipa to take their water, with the hopes that someday Beaumont will come around. All these things are in agendas and downloads available to the public, which part are you disputing?