.
Feedback

Four Arrested for Purse Theft at Outlets

Four Orange County men are suspected of stealing more than $10,000 in purses from Dolce and Gabanna.

Four men were arrested after they stole approximately $10,000 worth of purses from Dolce and Gabanna at the Desert Hills Premium Outlets.

The suspects entered the store at 8 p.m., just as employees, were locking the front doors and removed numerous high end purses, said Sgt. Alan Meservey, of the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. They fled in a waiting car.


Dolce and Gabanna employees immediately reported the burglary and provided a description of the three suspects, while a mall patron described the getaway car as a white Mercedes Benz with dealer plates. Deputies then posted up on Interstate 10 at Highland Springs Avenue to wait for the suspects. Deputies spotted the car traveling west on I-10 and began pursuit, eventually conducting a high risk felony stop on Highway 60 just west of Jack Rabbit Trail.

The purses were recovered after a search of the Mercedes Benz.

Store employees and witnesses later positively identified the suspects as the men who stole the purses. 

Paul Hayes, 25, of Anaheim, Ackeem Ramsay, 22, of Anaheim, Nquenzeni Moyo, 22 of Garden Grove and Anthony Smith, 21 of Buena Park, were all booked into the Smith Correctional Facility in Banning on charges of commercial burglary and conspiracy. They are each being held on $25,000 bail.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Washy August 28, 2012 at 11:21 pm
WTG employees!! Hope the store treats these awesome employees to a raise. That is an awesome amount of money saved for the store!
Mariana Zuelsdorf August 28, 2012 at 11:54 pm
Totally agree, Washy! That's a whole lot of money
Inside Informer August 29, 2012 at 09:49 am
It was probably only 3 or 4 purses
ATC August 29, 2012 at 10:47 am
A raise? For what? The store was robbed by some lowlifes, the employees provided a description to the police, police apprehended the perps, the employees identified them. I would think that is exactly what ANY employee would be expected to do.
What was their alternative action? Refuse to cooperate with the police? Refuse to give descriptions? And a mall patron, not an employee, gave a description of the vehicle, which is what allowed police to actually apprehend the thieves. A Raise? Kinda like all of the "participation" trophies given out in youth sports, right?
steve August 29, 2012 at 12:40 pm
Dang Gary, I've never read anything you've written that wasn't meant to degrade or humiliate someone for having an opinion.. these ladies wrote something nice and positive and you couldn't wait to poopoo all over them.. Dolce and Gabanna should give the employees a bonus and the mall patron a free purse of their choice, JUST BECAUSE!!!!
D.Morris August 29, 2012 at 01:22 pm
Well said Steve!!!
ATC August 29, 2012 at 01:44 pm
Then you obviously haven't read everything that I've written. And you should talk about writing insulting comments here, eh? Glass houses ring a bell?
Don't misunderstand, I'm not putting the employees down, I just don't see that they did anythiing spectactular, that's all. Explain to me how what I said here degraded or humiliated anyone, or "poopoo'd" on them. I just stated some facts. Were any of them wrong? No. What exactly did the employees do that was so special? That justifies a raise? Of course, that's the society we live in today, I guess. We all expect "high-fives", "Atta-boys", and "Kudos" just for doing what we should all be doing without question in the first place. Of course, we also "worship" sports stars and/or rappers as "heroes", rather than doctors, teachers, fire fighters, and police..but that's another blog altogether. I guarantee you won't hear "Washy" praising the officers that actually made the arrest in this case, when they are the ones who actually DID something.
Aaron Alexander August 29, 2012 at 03:07 pm
Don't praise anyone for doing their job EXCEPT for police, because you arnt allowed to criticizes them because their jobs are "harder" and because they are public servants. Wait what?!
Don't tip the lady at Starbucks for making your coffee either because it's her job. Funny how hypocritical some people are.
ATC August 29, 2012 at 03:35 pm
Wow, interesting how you can twist things to fit your perspective, and "read my mind" I guess? I didn't "praise" the police for doing their job, nor did I say it was ok because their jobs are "harder" or that they are public servants...that's all your statements. I was simply pointing out the fact, that while the OP (Washy) heaps praise on the employees (who didn't really do anything), he has never said anything other than insults about police.
As for tipping at Starbucks, that's irrelevant to this article, unless I'm missing something. Do you tip the cashier at McDonalds? (again, irrelevant) You have yet to explain what the employees did that JUSTIFIES A RAISE. That's my question, and that's where your self-rightous responses continue to fall short. You'd rather attack me personally than actually make a legitimate argument for those raises.
Aaron Alexander August 29, 2012 at 03:36 pm
I don't think they deserve a raise, maybe a "good job", but that's more about keeping employee morale up.
My point was police don't deserve praise every time they do their jobs either. And if you think they do then they should also expect to get criticized when they don't. Can't have it both ways.
ATC August 29, 2012 at 03:49 pm
Then why attack me for saying I don't think they deserve a raise? I've never said the police deserve praise here, nor have I ever said that they can't be criticized when they are in the wrong. Again, that's your claim.
Debate me with facts, I welcome it, and you might change my mind. It's happened before, and it'll happen again (or maybe I'll even change your mind). But as soon as someone resorts to name calling, insults, exaggerations, lies...then their credibility is lost, as is their argument.
Aaron Alexander August 29, 2012 at 03:52 pm
I'm not attacking you. Just pointing out how similar these two examples are and that you have drastically different views, because one person hangs up purses while the other is a cop. You say the employer shouldn't praise them for doing what the employer hired them to do(their job, broad scope). I say I shouldn't have to praise cops for doing their jobs (taxpayer plays role of manager with expectations that they DO their job at all times).
ATC August 29, 2012 at 04:39 pm
Well, two posts up, you called me a hypocrite, so I take that as an attack. You also say that while the two examples are similar, I have drastically different views about them, but that's where you lost me. Am I blind, or are you? Where are you seeing that I have different views on those two?
I have NEVER said that police deserve praise for doing their jobs. I have NEVER said that police cannot be criticized when they are wrong. I don't think anyone, in any profession, deserves "rewards" for doing what their job description calls for, retail clerk or police officer, because that is what they are supposed to do. When have I said differently?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ellen Carr June 16, 2013 at 07:37 am
Right on, Washy!
Lloyd White June 17, 2013 at 10:41 am
I find it interesting the RG was all over the State of the City luncheon but not interested inRead More printing the questions and issues raised by the Mayor's unsubstantiated claims. We should stop paying any attention to the RG if they aren't interested in what's really happening in Beaumont. I don't subscribe to the RG but it is still delivered to my house every week. Does anyone know how to stop the delivery? I could just pick it up each week and throw it in the trash but then their circulation won't be accurately represented to their advertisers. I'm going to start asking local business to stop advertising in the RG.
Ken June 17, 2013 at 11:47 am
Great idea Lloyd..They dont deliver to the old neighborhoods I guess. I generally pay the 50 centsRead More to see what they DIDNT print.
Ben June 16, 2013 at 06:26 pm
Maybe you could help the feed store itself find some low cost spay clinics for the cats they alwaysRead More have. They go through cats every week it seems. One just had kittens, and now someone just gave them another, who if not spayed now will probably have kittens, too. They have cages full of kittens all the time. Someone in this area needs to do spays cheap for these people who can't seem to get their acts together.
toni pomeroy June 17, 2013 at 04:47 am
I LEFT A COMMENT ON THIS AND AS SOON AS I HIT THE (POST COMMENT) IT DISAPPEARED! WHATS THE USE OFRead More WRITTING ANYTHING IF IT DOESN'T POST?
Get Mobiled June 17, 2013 at 06:36 pm
What better place to leave a horse if someone cannot afford to keep it? Times are tough and youRead More never know the circumstances
Aubreey we Love You!!!
Gina Tenorio (Editor) June 13, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Beautiful! Now this is great news! Thank you both so much for sharing the news of your blessing withRead More the rest of us.
Kathleen Mccrary June 10, 2013 at 03:50 pm
THIS ADD WAS WRITTEN WRONG SORRY.LOL THE ONE ABOVE IT IS THE CORRECT ADD.
Courtesy of the U.S. Forest Service.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 10:59 am
Great photo, Julie... thanks for sharing!
Ben June 11, 2013 at 02:04 pm
Niki- yes the plans have been updated to allow Banning and Yucaipa to share in the use of the newRead More ponds. It is an inter-agency plan that is beneficial to everyone. Why you consider having other entities share this project, which bonds us all together: they are paying to help build the new area so we, as ratepayers aren't hit with the whole bill, and we are going to finally get some recycled water into use from Yucaipa, Banning gets new wells, and no matter what- we have ultimate control over the use at all times- how that is a horror story I can't figure out. These plans were in the works for years, it was no secret. Its now being finalized by the board- as the details are now ironed out. The only horror story I see happening is how Beaumont refuses to make an agreement with the district to utilize their recycled water- and its not all the water district's fault like you think. Beaumont can't build unless they find some new sources of water. One of the reasons they pulled out is once they update their wastewater facility- they don't plan on wasting that recycled water just on landscaping . They are going to dump it into the basin itself for the water credit. Beaumont residents have no clue that their drinking water will eventually be more wastewater than water coming down the mountain. Sorry- but I think Fraser is doing a great job. If he hadn't got in there, the district would belong to Beaumont, who would take all the water they want regardless of impact studies, and siphon off all the money for their own uses. Guess you missed their lawsuit in the courts- the courts laughed them out. Beaumont is broke. The water district is financially sound.
Niki Magee June 13, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Ben, it is unfortunate you are the victim of such serious misinformation. I thought I knew everyoneRead More at last night's BCVWD meeting. Who were you?
Claire Frémont June 15, 2013 at 09:59 am
I'm curious, Niki, what misinformation are you speaking of concerning Ben's comment? He appears toRead More be stating information that I've read about also. Beaumont did sue to try and take over the water district, they did get a cease and desist order to stop dumping their wastewater into the aquifer, and have pulled out of all negotiations with the district to supply them with recycled water. The district has made the arrangements instead with Yucaipa to take their water, with the hopes that someday Beaumont will come around. All these things are in agendas and downloads available to the public, which part are you disputing?