.
Feedback

Beaumont Murder Trial Defense Atty: 'There Was a Great Injustice Here'

'I think the record should be set straight because there is a huge misunderstanding,' Susanne Cho of Palm Desert said. 'The Albarran family deserves to know the truth too. I don't want them to hate my client or the jury.'

Ever since a disturbance outside Celebrities led to gunfire that resulted in the death of Andy Albarran, Beaumont police and the City of Beaumont have maintained Demario Jackson shot at Albarran early July 16, 2011.

The first press release, issued that day and titled "Officer Involved Shooting," included the statement:

As the officer approached the fight, he observed a male subject firing a weapon at another male subject.

Albarran died later that day at a hospital. The next press release, dated July 17 and titled "Officer Involved Shooting Update," included the statement:

. . . (A)n officer from the Beaumont Police Department was checking reports of a fight in the 500 block of Beaumont Avenue when he observed a male suspect shooting a male victim, identified as Andy Albarran, age 46 of Beaumont, multiple times.

The next press release, dated July 20 and titled "Suspect Arrested," repeated the statement and named Jackson:

 . . . (A) Beaumont police officer was checking reports of a fight in the 500 block of Beaumont Avenue when he observed Jackson shooting a male victim, identified as Andy Albarran, age 46 of Beaumont. The officer ordered Jackson to drop the weapon and after he refused, the officer shot him believing he was going to continue shooting.

Last week, more than 15 months after the shooting and his arrest, Jackson, 26, of Banning, walked out of court a free man, acquitted by a jury in Riverside and found not guilty of murder.

The aim of this report is to examine statements and evidence presented by Jackson's defense, which jurors found outweighed statements and evidence presented by Beaumont police, the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, and the District Attorney.

Jackson's defense attorney contacted Banning-Beaumont Patch within hours of the jury's verdict on Thursday Nov. 1, 2012.

"I think the record should be set straight because there is a huge misunderstanding," Susanne Cho of Palm Desert said. "The Albarran family deserves to know the truth too. I don't want them to hate my client or the jury."

Cho said sheriff's investigators rushed to judgment against Jackson, they refused to properly investigate Albarran's death, and the resulting prosecution was unfair to her client and to the Albarran family.

Cho said she worked with her own investigators to gather evidence and examine records created during the sheriff's and coroner's investigations, including the autopsy report, which showed Albarran was shot in the back and the shoulder.

'The Most Consistent Evidence in the Case'

At a preliminary hearing on Dec. 1, 2011, Cho stated:

"Generally, on a murder case . . . there has to be  strong suspicion that Mr. Jackson, in fact, shot this decedent, Mr. Albarran.

"The best indication from the officer involved in the shooting is that these two people are engaged in some kind of physical confrontation. They're facing each other. They are about two feet apart. The officer shows up. And I know this is a traumatic experience for him, but he says he saw muzzle flash. He assumes my client is shooting the decedent, and he shoots towards those two individuals, two shots hitting Mr. Jackson.

"And my position, from his own testimony, is that we believe that the officer accidentally shot the decedent, in that the officer was facing the back of the decedent to his side. That's the most consistent evidence in this case."

Five weeks after the preliminary hearing, in January 2012, Beaumont police Officer Brent Conan was named the city's Law Enforcement Officer of the Year for 2011 for his actions outside Celebrities.

Conan testified during trial that on July 16, 2011, he was working the 8 p.m. to 8 a.m. shift and shortly after 1 a.m. he went to Celebrities to check on the crowd at a popular DJ show.

Conan said he parked by ATM machines at the Wells Fargo across the lot from Celebrities, to keep an eye on people leaving the club. One group came out and got in a vehicle, then got out and walked back over to Celebrities. Then another group of people came out, walking toward Conan.

"One of them - I believe it was a female - started waving her arms and then kind of pointing towards the back door of Celebrities," Conan testified. "I got the indication by her body language that something was obviously going on."

Conan said he drove close to the rear entrance of the club and found about 50 people outside, some who were "obviously arguing."

'A Group of People Physically Fighting'

Conan radioed some other night shift officers that there was an incident at Celebrities, and spoke to his sergeant as well, according to his testimony.

When he looked back at the area where he'd been parked by the Wells Fargo, he saw "a group of people physically fighting," Conan testified.

"It was approximately three, maybe five people when I first glanced when I was standing next to my patrol unit," Conan testified.

When he got closer, Conan said it looked like two males, one Hispanic and one black, were fighting and a third male looked like he was trying to separate the two.

He did not see a number of people beating up one person, or anybody jumping anyone else, Conan testified.

The officer said he started running toward the fight, grabbing his pepper spray.

"As I was running towards the men that were fighting, I heard a sound, and it was like a high-pitched pop similar to that of a firecracker," Conan testified.

Conan said he looked behind him, began putting his pepper spray away and drawing his firearm, because he was under the impression the sound could have been a gunshot. Then he saw a muzzle flash, and he saw the black male was holding a silver-looking semiautomatic handgun.

"And then after the first shot, I yelled to drop the gun," Conan testified. "I had my firearm in my hand at that time. And then almost the exact same time that I'm finishing saying 'gun' is when the second shot happened. . . . That is when I fired my gun at him."

Evidence presented at trial showed a total of seven shots were fired - two by Jackson and five by Conan.

'He Came Out of the Club with a Lady Friend'

Cho said she presented evidence that contradicted Conan's testimony.

First, she showed Jackson acted in self-defense when he drew a handgun in the parking lot outside Celebrities, she said.

"He came out of the club with a lady friend, he was walking to his car, and a few feet away from his car he was attacked by several individuals from behind," Cho said.

"When Mr. Jackson grabbed his gun he did so in order to protect himself and to ward off assailants," Cho said. "The jurors believed the first discharge from Mr. Jackson's gun was a panic discharge, an accidental panic discharge.

"It was obvious that both discharges were not intended to hit Mr. Albarran, and neither of them struck Mr. Albarran," Cho said. "However from his vantage point Officer Conan thought Mr. Jackson was shooting at Mr. Albarran and fired five shots. The officer shot from about 40 feet away in the dark."

When police searched Mr. Albarran's clothing they neglected to write down in any of their reports that there was a screwdriver in Albarran's Levi's jeans pocket, Cho said.

"Normally the police are supposed to document details like that, especially in a homicide investigation," Cho said. "There were no obvious markings on the screwdriver, but during trial it came out that Mr. Jackson had a puncture wound on his back with blood on his shirt that was unaccounted for."

There was no evidence that Albarran used the screwdriver or stabbed Jackson, Cho said.

"However the puncture wound on his back and the blood on his shirt supported Mr. Jackson's claim of self-defense," Cho said.

The jurors said after deliberations that even if Albarran did not stab Jackson, Jackson was entitled to defend himself because he was outnumbered, Cho said.

"The jurors focused on the evidence that showed he was assaulted, that he was acting in self defense and that he was with a female friend," Cho said. "So he couldn't just run away because he wasn't by himself."

Audio of the incident presented at trial includes the two gunshots from Jackson's gun but it does not include Conan saying or yelling "Drop the weapon," Cho said.

"We only heard him yell 'Get down!' after the shooting," Cho said. "He wanted to believe he said it and that my client refused to comply but that did not happen."

Sheriff's investigators recovered the two projectiles from Jackson's gun and casings to match on the same day of the shooting, Cho said. They also recovered five shell casings from Conan's gun, and one jacket of a bullet, but recovered none of the bullets themselves, Cho said.

In November 2011, she and her investigators recovered three of five hollow-point .45 caliber bullets fired by Conan outside Celebrities, she said.

"The police department and RSO refused to take the evidence when we offered it to them, until two weeks before trial," Cho said. "The Department of Justice confirmed they came from Officer Conan's gun, and the prosecution conceded as much.

"The Department of Justice found no tissue, no blood, no trace evidence that the bullets from my client struck Albarran," Cho said.

Using bullet trajectories based on evidence from the shooting scene, the defense team worked with a graphic artist to create three-dimensional animations of what occurred outside Celebrities. Two images from one of the animations are attached to this report.

The defense knew that Conan accidentally shot Albarran, Cho said.

"The prosecution and RSO refused to examine that possibility or evidence," she said. "Finally, on the first day of jury selection, the prosecutor told the judge that they will seek a murder conviction based on an alternative theory called 'provocative act murder' because the jury may believe Officer Conan shot Albarran."

Cho is a private attorney. She was hired by Jackson's family before police announced his arrest. The day of Jackson's arrest, she reached out on Banning-Beaumont Patch to potential witnesses and to a Patch user who uploaded a video that appeared to capture sights and sounds outside Celebrities the night of the shooting.

"His family retained my services but in the end they did not have enough money to cover the costs of trial," Cho said. "We did it without payment because we believed in the case, we believed in his innocence. There was a great injustice here. I couldn't walk away from it."

Follow Banning-Beaumont Patch on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the free daily newsletter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
His brother and sister miss him!
Alexis May 23, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Good idea! Thank you for your concern. I posted flyers today and tomorrow I'll be passing more our.Read More Ours loves strawberries!
Claire Frémont May 23, 2013 at 10:13 am
You should note in your lost ads that tortoises are not turtles, so if found should not be put inRead More water. I had desert tortoises, the much slower kind than yours. One got out and when I finally got a call that he was found went to collect him and the people had him up to his neck in a wading pool. Was he glad to see me! I hope you find yours, they are wonderful little creatures. Mine especially loved bananas to the point that you couldn't wear flip-flops around him for he'd think he saw a snack.
James Hampton May 23, 2013 at 06:20 pm
That's what I meant, Jeremiah. He must have deleted his own posts, for they stayed gone, and flaggedRead More yours and ATC's out of spite. They went into the review/flag system to be checked as to appropriate content. Once determined content was not in violation of Patch policy as to personal attacks, swearing, etc. they are posted back up. It used to take a few flags to have remarks taken down for review, that is, unless the editor is paying attention and takes something very offensive down themselves. They will usually state that they did so. Now it seems that just one flag starts the process. Now we will just have to pay attention as to figure out who has the desire or motive to flag a comment that is not violating Patch policy, usually in retaliation for something said to them. I still think my theory on what transpired here stands.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Just a side note everyone. There's a pretty hefty spam filter in place. This catches both contentRead More that the system thinks is spam-- and things that are flagged. I have been going in a couple times a day and pushing things through. So if a comment is gone, and reappears, that is why.
Jeremiah Price May 23, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Just to clarify - the Patch didn't respond to complaints as a reason to change this. This has beenRead More in the works for a while and the same changes have been made back east as well as out here. What they did was go to Facebook style comments which allow users to control their own blogs and posts and delete anything not acceptible to them. That is not the purpose of the forums here on the Patch - these are discussion boards. These type of boards debate ideas and concepts and facts and anyone posting from ego or factually incorrect is supposed to be called on it. They are two different types of posting and Facebook posting does not work when you are discussing issues of government within a local government. I do agree with your last statement, though - the Patch will go down as a credible news and discussion forum because whoever it is that made the changes is in a position of power and is not going to admit they were wrong. FYI - the thought that Victor removed my post or ATC's post doesn't fit - they were both put back up once we made a complaint, so they obviously weren't flagged as inappropriate. It goes deeper than that. Thanks for your thoughts in response to my comments - they are appreciated! Jeremiah Price
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
Jeremiah Price May 23, 2013 at 11:11 am
No, Renee, no offense to you and thank you for your suggestion but I will never start doing theRead More "Twitter" hashtag thing to point my comments in a linear stream. I will quit posting first. I notice that now that my reply to Victor's comment has been put back, but his is still gone. Will you give us all the contact phone number for the Patch executive who decided to force all this upon us without ever a trial or anything else? And I agree with Dex on another post - whoever is doing the site design and maintenance needs to get further information and training or find another job. The glitches on this web page are simple HTML errors that could have been easily fixed by this time by anyone with basic HTML knowledge. I am sorry for the advertisers here - they might have gotten more real estate, but they have far less exposure now. With drop in readership that is occurring as we speak they will soon look for other places to advertise - places that pay attention to the desires of their readers. Sorry that you have to deal with all this, Renee - you were doing a very fine job that we all appreciated until they made your life miserable right along with ours. Well, not our lives but certainly our patch experience! Jerremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 07:26 am
And now it's back!?!? Wow, this "great new format" is really impressive, eh? And ofRead More course the one thing that many have wanted, many have asked for, the one thing that would have been easy to add; the ability for a person to edit their post, is still nowhere to be found. We must delete the entire post and rewrite it if we make a typo. Yeah, that's logical. Patch Powers that be: Please listen to your readership. Bring back the ability to comment on specific comments (not just at the end), bring back the "latest comments" section on the front page (so readers can see what's hot/active at a glance), and for crying out loud, add the ability to edit our posts (it's not really rocket science here, people). Those three things would likely eliminate 90% of the complaints about this new format. Of course, I'm not about to hold my breath. I don't think they really care, nor really listen.
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Washy May 22, 2013 at 04:38 pm
hey go to your right and click the green feedback tab and tell them what you think.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Links..........On this page, you can find links to helpful websites, studies and documentaries toRead More learn more about genetically-modified products and how to avoid them. www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
March Against Monsanto official communication........... I would like to say that I am beyondRead More honored to be a part of this. It's really amazing to see people—of all ages, from different cultures, all walks of life, different belief systems, etc.—working together as One, for the shared goal of protecting Earth and everything that Earth includes: Humans, Animals, Plants... This is a critical issue of our time and I am blessed to be a part of something that will go down in history for changing the world for the better (or, as I also like to refer to it, readjusting and returning to our truth, which among other things includes seeing the interconnectedness of things and working *with* Nature). A thought came to my mind yesterday: I'm sure you've heard that many countries already have bans and restrictions on GMOs and what Monsanto can/can't do. Yet, take a look at the Event List. You'll see the very same countries listed as participants of this March. Many people from countries that already have bans will be participating in this March along with the rest of us who aren't in that place yet [of Bans and Restrictions on Monsanto's atrocities]. They, just like the rest of us, are taking time out of their routines and schedules, putting other things on the back burner and putting in the work and effort, to take a stand, to stand together. Thank you for organizing, participating, marching... Thank you. .........Admn. for March Against Monsanto http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 04:01 pm
On the contrary, evidence presented in this report indicates that GM crops: ● Are laboratory-made,Read More using technology that is totally different from natural breeding methods, and pose different risks from non-GM crops ● Can be toxic, allergenic or less nutritious than their natural counterparts ● Are not adequately regulated to ensure safety ● Do not increase yield potential ● Do not reduce pesticide use but increase it ● Create serious problems for farmers, including herbicide-tolerant “superweeds”, compromised soil quality, and increased disease susceptibility in crops ● Have mixed economic effects ● Harm soil quality, disrupts ecosystems, and reduces biodiversity ● Do not offer effective solutions to climate change ● Are as energy-hungry as any other chemically-farmed crops ● Cannot solve the problem of world hunger but distract from its real causes – poverty, lack of access to food and, increasingly, lack of access to land to grow it on. Based on the evidence presented in this report, there is no need to take risks with GM crops when effective, readily available, and sustainable solutions to the problems that GM technology is claimed to address already exist. Conventional plant breeding, in some cases helped by safe modern technologies like gene mapping and marker assisted selection, continues to outperform GM in producing high-yield, drought-tolerant, and pest- and disease-resistant crops that can meet our present and future food needs. Conduct your own research to form your own opinion instead of repeating hear-say.
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
Seriously? An article claiming St. Patrick's Day is fast approaching...posted nearly 2 months AFTERRead More St. Patrick's Day? Yup, another home run by the Patch's new format!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)