.
Feedback

Beaumont Audit VIII - Electric and Water Utilities

Utility Audit Exposes Poor Management, Waste of Tax Payer Dollars.

Utility bills are generally not examined during an audit because they have little material value. Whether it's a private company, public entity, or a personal home budget; utility bills can be 'saved upon', but not dramatically altered. The City of Beaumont proves that utility bills can indeed be dramatically altered.

The 1st record request was in December, 2012 for copies of the Water and Electric bills for the past year. After a month of stalling the City stated the copies would be over $2,000.00. I then requested three (3) months – August, September, & October. The City of charged $450.00 for the water and electric bills.

The procedure for issuing checks is: The bills are collected and coded to the individual departments that created the expense. When a check is issued a copy of the check with the bills attached are filed.

The Check Warrants should show the check and the amount allocated to each department. The City of Beaumont does not show accounting codes on their check warrants.

When the Taxpayer requests a copy of a check the procedure is to open the filing cabinet, pull out the copy of the check with invoice/receipt verifications attached, and print a copy. This information is verified by the City Clerk before received by the Tax Payer.

Before I could start reviewing the utility bills I had to go through and pull out about 450 of pieces of worthless paper. Apparently every month the City waste time and money purchasing, copying, & filing hundreds of worthless sheets of papers. The City then pays a storage company to store thousands of worthless sheets of papers every year.

Processing worthless papers shows poor management by the Finance Director and City Manager. Attesting to the validity of these worthless pages is considered Forging a Government Document by the City Clerk.

 

Southern California Electric – Check # 81034 – 10/19/12 - $65,130.43

The check has $32,329.53 charged to the General Fund, $32,427.28 transferred to the Sewer Service Fund, $373.62 to Transit/Vehicle Maintenance.

The Sewer Service So Cal Edison bill is for three addresses.

6301 Plant D-7 $1,147.24

6402 Plant $18,783.45

715 West 4th $12,496.59

The General Fund So Cal Edison bill is divided eight (8) departments:

General government – 550 East 6th St $2,508.38

Community Rec Center – 1310 Oak Valley Pkwy $4,615.81

Police – 550 East 6th $1,455.16

Fire – 628 Maple $622.93

Street Maintenance – 394 W Oak Valley Pkwy $111.28

The spreadsheet attached to the bills list the Maintenance dept. charged $328.41, but the City's spreadsheet shows the Maintenance dept. has the following addresses with electric charges:

135 Lenora Ct $26.37

1245 Leaf St $26.37

101 gloria $26.50

12942 Potrero Blvd $1,378.45

455 W 4th St $497.08

 

$248.54 is coded to '3100', but there is no Department 3100 on the Budget.

$22,439.02 is coded to '3350', but there is no Department 3350 on the Budget. 

The City of Beaumont codes $23,439.02 to the nonexistent department 3350, lists the location as 'Various', and has no receipts for these transactions.

 

Beaumont Cherry Valley Water – Check # 80557 – 08/31/12 - $191,371.02 

This check has 130 bills attached. It's hard to fathom how a city could use $191,000 in water until you look at the bills. Only about half the expense is for water, the other half is meter fees and Passthru charges.

The Water District charges a 'meter fee' that ranges from $18.01 - $828.00. There are many bills that have nothing but meter charges.

Water bill account # 001 4002 001 and account # 001 4003 001 both lists service addresses as: 100' N of 2 Irr Mtr Xenia.

The 4002 account bill is $12,309.02 and lists $72.05 Service Charge, $3.33 Backflow Administration charge, $2,900.76 SPW Import Water charge, $2,080.98 SCE Import Electricity charge, and $7,251.90 for Water.

The 4003 account bill is an additional Meter charge of $72.05 and Backflow Administration charge of $3.33, but there is no water use. The City pays for two meters when only one is in use.

The following accounts and addresses all charge meter use, but have no water usage:

043 0590 000 – Rangel Park $51.70

045 0713 000 – Palmer Park/Palmer Ave $29.86

045 0781 001 – Area 1 Sewer Lift Station $40.75

045 0990 000 – Morgan & Monte Vista Park $62.52

045 1100 000 – At Park North of Pool $182.37

045 1624 001 – 1245 Leaf Street $62.52

045 0240 000 – Cameron & Pennsylvania $21.80

045 0370 000 – Beaumont Ave/ Brookside Ave $62.52

In this water bill the City of Beaumont paid the follow for two blocks of Seneca Springs Parkway:

Seneca Springs Park Area $3,007.30

Seneca Springs West of Park $1,038.20

30 Seneca Springs $3,855.38

71 Seneca Springs $285.78

70 Seneca Springs $4,353.96

70 Seneca Springs $ 131.77

90 Seneca Springs $5,323.96

94 Seneca Springs $1,403.22

117 Seneca Springs $1,135.20

The total Water Bill for this two block area is $20,534.77. $11,608.89 is Water charges, the rest is meter fees and Passthru charges.

The City of Beaumont has 24 bills with addresses for individual islands along Palm Ave: 'Palm-1st Island S of 6th', 'Palm-2nd Island S of 6th, etc... These bill total $10,193.44. The Meter Fees alone total $2,157.96.

The City paid $3,736.45 for 'Sundance CR-1st'; and $2,799.43 for 'Sundance CR-2nd'. This City also list $2,543.94 for '1202 Starlight Ave' – which is front of the Sundance Community. There appears to be several City utility bills inside Home Owners Association Communities.

Ring Ranch Road is another two block ares that has four (4) water bills totaling $7,946.28.

The City blacked out the Service Address on account # 098 1211 001, but the City's spreadsheet lists the bill address as: 'Truck 2406' and the meter charge is listed as 'Construction'.

There are dozens of meters installed all over the City of Beaumont for water and electric. When a business, agency, or private individual installs utilities they want the minimum number of meters to minimize costs.

The City of Beaumont is wasting thousands of dollars every month through poor utility management alone.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
His brother and sister miss him!
ATC May 24, 2013 at 03:55 pm
That doesn't look like a Desert Tortoise, so registration likely wouldn't be required. Is he anRead More African Spurred Tortoise?
Washy May 24, 2013 at 02:15 pm
he is registered right?
Alexis May 23, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Good idea! Thank you for your concern. I posted flyers today and tomorrow I'll be passing more our.Read More Ours loves strawberries!
Tempest May 24, 2013 at 10:42 am
Ya Tony- ghosts who love the recommend button, the delete button, and the flag button- thenRead More disappear completely into the beyond, only to resurrect as ????? Got to get us that green spotter light that those Ghost Hunters use, shine it around and yell did you see that? Kinda think the Patch is too young to already have ghosts- but found no less than five in my old Atari game console. Little buggers
tony May 24, 2013 at 08:16 am
Ghosts in the machine.
James Hampton May 23, 2013 at 06:20 pm
That's what I meant, Jeremiah. He must have deleted his own posts, for they stayed gone, and flaggedRead More yours and ATC's out of spite. They went into the review/flag system to be checked as to appropriate content. Once determined content was not in violation of Patch policy as to personal attacks, swearing, etc. they are posted back up. It used to take a few flags to have remarks taken down for review, that is, unless the editor is paying attention and takes something very offensive down themselves. They will usually state that they did so. Now it seems that just one flag starts the process. Now we will just have to pay attention as to figure out who has the desire or motive to flag a comment that is not violating Patch policy, usually in retaliation for something said to them. I still think my theory on what transpired here stands.
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
Jeremiah Price May 23, 2013 at 11:11 am
No, Renee, no offense to you and thank you for your suggestion but I will never start doing theRead More "Twitter" hashtag thing to point my comments in a linear stream. I will quit posting first. I notice that now that my reply to Victor's comment has been put back, but his is still gone. Will you give us all the contact phone number for the Patch executive who decided to force all this upon us without ever a trial or anything else? And I agree with Dex on another post - whoever is doing the site design and maintenance needs to get further information and training or find another job. The glitches on this web page are simple HTML errors that could have been easily fixed by this time by anyone with basic HTML knowledge. I am sorry for the advertisers here - they might have gotten more real estate, but they have far less exposure now. With drop in readership that is occurring as we speak they will soon look for other places to advertise - places that pay attention to the desires of their readers. Sorry that you have to deal with all this, Renee - you were doing a very fine job that we all appreciated until they made your life miserable right along with ours. Well, not our lives but certainly our patch experience! Jerremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 07:26 am
And now it's back!?!? Wow, this "great new format" is really impressive, eh? And ofRead More course the one thing that many have wanted, many have asked for, the one thing that would have been easy to add; the ability for a person to edit their post, is still nowhere to be found. We must delete the entire post and rewrite it if we make a typo. Yeah, that's logical. Patch Powers that be: Please listen to your readership. Bring back the ability to comment on specific comments (not just at the end), bring back the "latest comments" section on the front page (so readers can see what's hot/active at a glance), and for crying out loud, add the ability to edit our posts (it's not really rocket science here, people). Those three things would likely eliminate 90% of the complaints about this new format. Of course, I'm not about to hold my breath. I don't think they really care, nor really listen.
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Washy May 22, 2013 at 04:38 pm
hey go to your right and click the green feedback tab and tell them what you think.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Links..........On this page, you can find links to helpful websites, studies and documentaries toRead More learn more about genetically-modified products and how to avoid them. www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
March Against Monsanto official communication........... I would like to say that I am beyondRead More honored to be a part of this. It's really amazing to see people—of all ages, from different cultures, all walks of life, different belief systems, etc.—working together as One, for the shared goal of protecting Earth and everything that Earth includes: Humans, Animals, Plants... This is a critical issue of our time and I am blessed to be a part of something that will go down in history for changing the world for the better (or, as I also like to refer to it, readjusting and returning to our truth, which among other things includes seeing the interconnectedness of things and working *with* Nature). A thought came to my mind yesterday: I'm sure you've heard that many countries already have bans and restrictions on GMOs and what Monsanto can/can't do. Yet, take a look at the Event List. You'll see the very same countries listed as participants of this March. Many people from countries that already have bans will be participating in this March along with the rest of us who aren't in that place yet [of Bans and Restrictions on Monsanto's atrocities]. They, just like the rest of us, are taking time out of their routines and schedules, putting other things on the back burner and putting in the work and effort, to take a stand, to stand together. Thank you for organizing, participating, marching... Thank you. .........Admn. for March Against Monsanto http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 04:01 pm
On the contrary, evidence presented in this report indicates that GM crops: ● Are laboratory-made,Read More using technology that is totally different from natural breeding methods, and pose different risks from non-GM crops ● Can be toxic, allergenic or less nutritious than their natural counterparts ● Are not adequately regulated to ensure safety ● Do not increase yield potential ● Do not reduce pesticide use but increase it ● Create serious problems for farmers, including herbicide-tolerant “superweeds”, compromised soil quality, and increased disease susceptibility in crops ● Have mixed economic effects ● Harm soil quality, disrupts ecosystems, and reduces biodiversity ● Do not offer effective solutions to climate change ● Are as energy-hungry as any other chemically-farmed crops ● Cannot solve the problem of world hunger but distract from its real causes – poverty, lack of access to food and, increasingly, lack of access to land to grow it on. Based on the evidence presented in this report, there is no need to take risks with GM crops when effective, readily available, and sustainable solutions to the problems that GM technology is claimed to address already exist. Conventional plant breeding, in some cases helped by safe modern technologies like gene mapping and marker assisted selection, continues to outperform GM in producing high-yield, drought-tolerant, and pest- and disease-resistant crops that can meet our present and future food needs. Conduct your own research to form your own opinion instead of repeating hear-say.
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
Seriously? An article claiming St. Patrick's Day is fast approaching...posted nearly 2 months AFTERRead More St. Patrick's Day? Yup, another home run by the Patch's new format!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)