.
Feedback

Beaumont Audit V: The Art of Padding Payroll

The City of Beaumont is padding their Employee Payroll Account by $3 Million/year - and now we know exactly where and how.

I have totaled all Payroll Transactions from the City of Beaumont General Ledger for the months of May through October, 2012. I have compared these totals with the Bank Statements and Council Check Warrants and found the general ledger has $1,301,068.96 more expenses attached to employee payroll than the automatic deposits documented on the Bank Statement.

The City Council Check Warrants have no correlation to either the Bank Statements or General Ledger. The Dates listed on the Check Warrant are not the correct Payroll Dates. The only time the Check Warrant dates and General Ledger dates corresponded was 10/25/12 when the City was shifting so much money it entered the payroll transaction #222921 with the date of 10/25/12 instead of the correct payroll date of 10/18/12.

The Check Warrants do verify that 'Guardian Insurance' check dates & amounts correlate with the Bank Statement, but the actual amounts recorded on the General Ledger average $2,000 more than the actual amounts paid.

I have seen the practice of listing alternate dates on the check warrants in other California cities. I have no idea how this 'procedure' originated, but each time the Finance Director lists the incorrect dates or amounts they are committing State and Federal felonies.

I audited a total of thirteen (13) pay periods from 05/01/12 – 10/25/12. I also included the General Leger payroll for 11/01/12 on the spreadsheet for reference because 10/25/12 was not actually a pay period.

Total Payroll Per the Bank Statement from May – October was $ 5,750,85.97.

Total Payroll Per General Ledger from May – October was $ 7,051.923.93.

This leaves a Material Misstatement of $1,301.068.96.

There is a difference of $473,080.04 between what the City states on the general ledger and the Bank Statement Payroll Deductions. Every pay date is overstated by at least $10,000.00. Deductions for vision, dental, disability, and life insurance are separate transactions and the check is issued to Guardian to pay for these costs. But the City also takes these deductions from the Payroll Transactions.

For example: 7000 - Transit Department shows the standard monthly Dental deduction of 32.61 was paid on 05/01/12, but the City of Beaumont attached another $150.00 dental deduction to the 05/05/12 payroll.

The largest discrepancy was on 07/27/12 when the bank statement shows payroll was $468,612.36, but the general ledger shows a total of $711,731.73 in payroll expenses. The City padded the employees' payroll by $1/4 Million on that one pay date alone.

The Month of October was a 'lost weekend' for the Accounting Department. Payroll issued on 10/05/12 was 'normal'; Bank Statement reported $421,431.06 in payroll, City general ledger recordings totaled $437,932.54. This leaves a $ 16,501.48 discrepancy, but for the City of Beaumont, that's normal.

The Bank shows payroll was issued 10/18/12 for $453,411.42 and shows no other payroll transaction between 10/05/12 and the end of the month.

The General Ledger lists their payroll on 10/25/12 with transaction # 222921 for $459,647.00.

The Beaumont General Ledger does have payroll transactions dated 10/12/12, but these are additional checks issued:

10/12/12 - #219889 - $105,323.91

10/12/12 - # 219909 - $29,702.97

Apparently the City 'got confused' when they issued additional checks for $135,026.88.

There are a total of seventeen (17) additional transactions totaling $827,998.92. The checks range in amounts, but every month there is a transaction over $100,000:

# 210440 – 06/08/12 - $107,838.85

#212635 – 06/30/12 - $106,940.65

#215697 – 08/17/12 - $107,434.68

#218901 – 09/28/12 - $103,123.34

#219889 – 10/12/12 - $105,323.91

The above transactions are coded 3020- Medical Insurance with the memo 'Cigna Health Care'. But there are no Cigna transactions listed on the Check Warrants. The City carries Kaiser and the Guardian Insurance to cover dental, disability, vision, & life.

The City also shows a massive transfers of money listed on the Council Check Warrants as 'Mutual of Omaha', but the City of Beaumont doesn't carry Mutual of Omaha Insurance. On the Bank Statements the automatic debit transactions are listed as 'MG Trust'.

There was a total of $78,864.54 in payroll charged to a department coded 7100. This department is not listed on the budget.

On 05/17/12 the City posted transaction #209836 giving a FICA credit of $439.14 to department 2000 – Quality of Life. This department does not have any FICA deductions taken from their employee's paychecks. Any overpayment from FICA should be credited back to the individual department.

The department of the City Manager is the only department to have 'STD Insurance'. The level of nasty the City Manager must exhibit to require STD Insurance has yet to be determined.

If I can find $1.3 Million addition employee expenses added to payroll in five months, the City of Beaumont is most likely padding their Employee Payroll Account by $3 Million/year.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 11:15 pm
@Jeremiah-- I have not deleted a single comment here on Patch since we've made the switch to the newRead More system (except for one duplicate post a user asked me to remove on their behalf). However, other users can flag comments and remove them from postings they've made, since it's "their content." The idea here is to let people voice their opinions... and if they are censoring the replies they get; that's not up to me. What posting was this on that your comments were removed?
Victor S Dominguez May 22, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Good to see you on Patch Paul. sometimes I forget you have a handicap you get more done than 90% ofRead More the people I know. I hope to see you one day soon, like our old days rolling around in the Van!
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
ATC May 22, 2013 at 07:26 am
And now it's back!?!? Wow, this "great new format" is really impressive, eh? And ofRead More course the one thing that many have wanted, many have asked for, the one thing that would have been easy to add; the ability for a person to edit their post, is still nowhere to be found. We must delete the entire post and rewrite it if we make a typo. Yeah, that's logical. Patch Powers that be: Please listen to your readership. Bring back the ability to comment on specific comments (not just at the end), bring back the "latest comments" section on the front page (so readers can see what's hot/active at a glance), and for crying out loud, add the ability to edit our posts (it's not really rocket science here, people). Those three things would likely eliminate 90% of the complaints about this new format. Of course, I'm not about to hold my breath. I don't think they really care, nor really listen.
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 01:18 pm
And the new "fornmat" continues to disappoint. Of course Victor deleted his insultingRead More response to Jeremiah, but then the powers that be deleted my lengthy response to Victor, which also had a number of salient points regarding Jeremiah's post. Seems the "censorship" is a bit more zealous with this new format, eh? Oh well, I predict a major decrease in the local voices that made the Patch one of the "go to" sites for local information, commentary, and debate. Sad, really, as I learned a significant amount of info about my community here in the past. No more, obviously.
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Steve, I was not aware of the lecture until the earlier post. Like you, I am learning the new siteRead More and how to navigate it. I was trying the new tools, Willie Boy was the topic of input, no agenda. So yes in the future I will have more meat and less potatoes :}
steve l May 21, 2013 at 12:02 pm
so this was a commercial for the lecture? i really didnt know, what with the new format, if i justRead More wasnt finding the article. i would have preferred some sort of story.
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 11:56 am
James, it got you to talk about it. Now look, information was shared and more people are aware ofRead More the speaking event on June 15. Not bad for just posting a picture. I wonder how many people googled more information as well just from this picture. James thanks for your input, it`s people like you that make me relevant ;]
Washy May 22, 2013 at 04:38 pm
hey go to your right and click the green feedback tab and tell them what you think.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Links..........On this page, you can find links to helpful websites, studies and documentaries toRead More learn more about genetically-modified products and how to avoid them. www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
March Against Monsanto official communication........... I would like to say that I am beyondRead More honored to be a part of this. It's really amazing to see people—of all ages, from different cultures, all walks of life, different belief systems, etc.—working together as One, for the shared goal of protecting Earth and everything that Earth includes: Humans, Animals, Plants... This is a critical issue of our time and I am blessed to be a part of something that will go down in history for changing the world for the better (or, as I also like to refer to it, readjusting and returning to our truth, which among other things includes seeing the interconnectedness of things and working *with* Nature). A thought came to my mind yesterday: I'm sure you've heard that many countries already have bans and restrictions on GMOs and what Monsanto can/can't do. Yet, take a look at the Event List. You'll see the very same countries listed as participants of this March. Many people from countries that already have bans will be participating in this March along with the rest of us who aren't in that place yet [of Bans and Restrictions on Monsanto's atrocities]. They, just like the rest of us, are taking time out of their routines and schedules, putting other things on the back burner and putting in the work and effort, to take a stand, to stand together. Thank you for organizing, participating, marching... Thank you. .........Admn. for March Against Monsanto http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 04:01 pm
On the contrary, evidence presented in this report indicates that GM crops: ● Are laboratory-made,Read More using technology that is totally different from natural breeding methods, and pose different risks from non-GM crops ● Can be toxic, allergenic or less nutritious than their natural counterparts ● Are not adequately regulated to ensure safety ● Do not increase yield potential ● Do not reduce pesticide use but increase it ● Create serious problems for farmers, including herbicide-tolerant “superweeds”, compromised soil quality, and increased disease susceptibility in crops ● Have mixed economic effects ● Harm soil quality, disrupts ecosystems, and reduces biodiversity ● Do not offer effective solutions to climate change ● Are as energy-hungry as any other chemically-farmed crops ● Cannot solve the problem of world hunger but distract from its real causes – poverty, lack of access to food and, increasingly, lack of access to land to grow it on. Based on the evidence presented in this report, there is no need to take risks with GM crops when effective, readily available, and sustainable solutions to the problems that GM technology is claimed to address already exist. Conventional plant breeding, in some cases helped by safe modern technologies like gene mapping and marker assisted selection, continues to outperform GM in producing high-yield, drought-tolerant, and pest- and disease-resistant crops that can meet our present and future food needs. Conduct your own research to form your own opinion instead of repeating hear-say.
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
Seriously? An article claiming St. Patrick's Day is fast approaching...posted nearly 2 months AFTERRead More St. Patrick's Day? Yup, another home run by the Patch's new format!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)