.
Feedback

In Honor Of Memorial Day – 7 Famous Dogs Of War

Reprinted with permission from Dan of The Dog Guide! http://www.dogguide.net/blog/2008/05/in-honor-of-memorial-day-7-famous-dogs-of-war/

In every Military conflict in our nation’s history, you will find stories of canine heroes.  Dogs have played vital roles as mascots, guards, trackers and even mine detectors – saving thousands of human lives.

During the Vietnam War approximately 4000 U.S dogs served in the conflict – at the time the Military viewed Dogs of War as “equipment”.  After the conflict the majority of the dogs were euthanized.  It is only in recent years that suitable veteran war dogs are allowed to be adopted into loving homes once they are retired.

I’ve highlighted 7 of the most famous Dogs Of War on this Memorial Day.  Their heroic actions should not be forsaken or forgotten.

Rags:

Rags was a Cairn Terrier mix who served as the mascot of the 1st Infantry Division during World War I.  He “joined up” in 1917 in France and held his title until his death in 1931.  Rags was recruited by Private James Donovan, who found himself AWOL  after overstaying his leave in Montremere.  Just as 2 military policemen approached him, he tripped over the small stray.  Donovan thought quickly and said he was part of a search party, sent out to find the Division’s Mascot.  Thus Donovan was out of hot water and Rags had a name and a job!  Though he was a small dog, Rags relayed messages from the front lines.  His greatest moment of heroism came during the Meuse-Argonne Campaign in 1918, when he ran a vital message through falling bombs.  Although the terrier was gassed and partially blinded, he survived.  Donovan however, was not so lucky.  In 1920 Rags was adopted by the family of Major Raymond W. Hardenberg.  He is buried at Aspen Hill Memorial Park & Animal Sanctuary in Maryland.

Chips:

Chips was a German Shepherd/Collie/Husky mix that ended up being the most decorated K9 that served during World War II.  Edward J. Wren owned Chips, but donated him to the army (private citizens were asked to donate their dogs to serve).  In 1942 Chips began his training as a sentry dog. He traveled the world while serving with the 3rd Infantry Division – seeing North Africa, Sicily, Italy, France and Germany.  In 1943, during the invasion of Sicily, Chips and his handler were trapped on the beach by machine gun fire.  Chips broke free of his handlers grip and ran towards the fire, attacking the gunmen and eventually causing their surrender to American troops.  For his heroism during the war he was given the Silver Star and Purple Heart, but those awards were later revoked (at that time dogs could not be given those awards).  He was unofficially given a Theater Ribbon with an Arrowhead and 8 battle stars (for each of his campaigns).  In 1945 he was returned to the Wren family.

Lex:

Lex is a German Shepherd that served in Iraq alongside Cpl. Dustin Lee.  Lee was killed in a mortar attack outside Falluja with Lex by his side.  The German Shepherd was so faithful to his handler that he had to be pulled away from him to allow medics to attend to Lee. The dog sustained some shrapnel wounds. Lex was present at Lee’s funeral and comforted his younger siblings.  Normally military dogs must “serve” until they are 10, but the family of Cpl. Lee was told that Lex would be able to take early retirement and come to live with them given the circumstances.  There was much bureaucratic paperwork, but eventually the Lee’s prevailed.   At a ceremony a Marine read a statement, “This is to certify that military working dog Lex, having served faithfully and honorably, was discharged from the United States Marine Corps on this 21st day of December 2007″.

Sargent Stubby:

Sargent Stubby was the Pit Bull hero of World War I.  He enlisted in the most unlikely of circumstances, wandering onto Yale University Field (which was being used at the time for military training)as a stray.  His stocky looks and good nature made him the perfect mascot.  When the soldiers were deploying, they had a quandary.  Most of them would be traveling via mass transit and they couldn’t sneak a dog on with them.  That’s when they discovered that Corporal J. Conroy would be traveling in a supply car.  At first he was resistant to the idea, but after meeting the endearing canine, he couldn’t refuse.  Somehow the soldiers managed to smuggle Stubby over to Europe (he wasn’t a trained military dog), and there his heroic career began.  He managed to alert soldiers to gas attacks in time for them to get their gas masks on, he captured a German spy and even saved a girl from an oncoming car!  Stubby almost perished from poison gas as well as a grenade attack, but the scrappy Pit Bull pulled through.  After 18 months in Europe Stubby returned home with Corporal Conroy.  When he attended Georgetown University Law School, Stubby became the unofficial Hoya mascot.  Stubby died in 1926.  His body is kept by the Smithsonian museum.  Here is a link to Stubby’s Obituary, printed in the “New York Times”,April 4th, 1926.


Smoky:

Smoky is the smallest of the Famous Military dogs on my list!  She was a 4 lb, 7 inch tall, Yorkshire Terrier who served in World War II.  In 1944 Smoky was found in a foxhole in the jungles of New Guinea by an American soldier who brought her back to camp and sold her to Corporal William A. Wynne for $6.44.  For the next 2 years Smoky lived a soldiers life.  Because she was not an official military dog, she did not get dog food or medical care.  She shared Wynne’s meals and slept beside him in his tent.  The little dog even flew 12 air/sea rescue and photo reconnaissance missions, secured in the soldiers backpack.  She survived 150 air raids and saved Wynne by warning him of incoming shells.  Like many Yorkies, Smoky also loved to learn tricks and preform.  She did so with the Special Services – entertaining soldiers in hospitals.  After the war Smoky was flown back to the US hidden in a oxygen mask carrying case.  For the next 10 years she made television and public appearances in Veterans hospitals until her death in 1957.  Smoky is considered the first Therapy Dog.

Sallie:

Sallie was a lady; she was a soldier too— She marched beside the colors, our own red white and blue. It was in the days of our civil war that she lived her life so true
Sallie was a brindle Staffordshire Bull Terrier (or Pit Bull Terrier – it is unclear) who served as the regimental mascot for the 11th Pennsylvania Volunteer Infantry during the Civil War. She was given to 1st Lt William R. Terry as when she was just 4 weeks of age. Sallie was raised with the men of the regiment and they were fond of her. She knew the specific drum roll announcing reveille.  Sallie followed the men closely on marches and to the battlefield, always on the front lines.  In a spring 1863 at a review of the Union army, Sallie marched along with “her” soldiers. Abraham Lincoln sat in the center of the reviewing stand and spotted the dog. He raised his famous hat in salute.  At Gettysburg, Sallie became separated from the 11th in all of the chaos.  Three days later they found Sallie guarding the bodies of the dead and wounded soldiers, herself unscathed.  In 1865 at Hatcher’s Run Sallie was struck by a bullet to the head.  She was killed instantly.  She was buried on the battlefield while under heavy enemy fire.  In 1890 the surviving veterans of the 11th Pennsylvania dedicated a monument on the Gettysburg battleground which contains a likeness of a sleeping Sallie.

Nemo:

Nemo the German Shepherd was a veteran of the Vietnam War.  Unlike most of the dogs that served during that time, Nemo was allowed to come home.  Nemo was trained to be a sentry dog at Lackland Airforce Base in Texas and was shipped to Vietnam in 1966.  After his original handler returned to the US, Nemo was paired with Airman Second Class Robert Thorneburg.  The two formed a close bond right away.  On  on December 3rd, 1966 after a night of fighting, Thorneburg and Nemo were out on patrol when Nemo sensed something.  Before he could radio for backup, a Thorneburg was shot in the shoulder and Nemo was shot in the muzzle.  The bullet entered under his right eye and exited through his mouth.  Ignoring the wound, Nemo ran towards the 4 gunmen and allowed Thorneburg the time to call for reinforcements.  Both man and dog were rushed in for emergency treatment.  Nemo’s right eye had to be removed and he received skin grafts on his wounds.  Eventually he was flown home to Lackland where he could receive the best Veterinary care.  He lived out the rest of his life at the dog training facility on the Lackland Air Force Base.  Nemo died on March 15, 1973.

Reprinted with permission from Dan of The Dog Guide!

http://www.dogguide.net/blog/2008/05/in-honor-of-memorial-day-7-famous-dogs-of-war/

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
His brother and sister miss him!
Alexis May 23, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Good idea! Thank you for your concern. I posted flyers today and tomorrow I'll be passing more our.Read More Ours loves strawberries!
Claire Frémont May 23, 2013 at 10:13 am
You should note in your lost ads that tortoises are not turtles, so if found should not be put inRead More water. I had desert tortoises, the much slower kind than yours. One got out and when I finally got a call that he was found went to collect him and the people had him up to his neck in a wading pool. Was he glad to see me! I hope you find yours, they are wonderful little creatures. Mine especially loved bananas to the point that you couldn't wear flip-flops around him for he'd think he saw a snack.
James Hampton May 23, 2013 at 06:20 pm
That's what I meant, Jeremiah. He must have deleted his own posts, for they stayed gone, and flaggedRead More yours and ATC's out of spite. They went into the review/flag system to be checked as to appropriate content. Once determined content was not in violation of Patch policy as to personal attacks, swearing, etc. they are posted back up. It used to take a few flags to have remarks taken down for review, that is, unless the editor is paying attention and takes something very offensive down themselves. They will usually state that they did so. Now it seems that just one flag starts the process. Now we will just have to pay attention as to figure out who has the desire or motive to flag a comment that is not violating Patch policy, usually in retaliation for something said to them. I still think my theory on what transpired here stands.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 03:25 pm
Just a side note everyone. There's a pretty hefty spam filter in place. This catches both contentRead More that the system thinks is spam-- and things that are flagged. I have been going in a couple times a day and pushing things through. So if a comment is gone, and reappears, that is why.
Jeremiah Price May 23, 2013 at 03:08 pm
Just to clarify - the Patch didn't respond to complaints as a reason to change this. This has beenRead More in the works for a while and the same changes have been made back east as well as out here. What they did was go to Facebook style comments which allow users to control their own blogs and posts and delete anything not acceptible to them. That is not the purpose of the forums here on the Patch - these are discussion boards. These type of boards debate ideas and concepts and facts and anyone posting from ego or factually incorrect is supposed to be called on it. They are two different types of posting and Facebook posting does not work when you are discussing issues of government within a local government. I do agree with your last statement, though - the Patch will go down as a credible news and discussion forum because whoever it is that made the changes is in a position of power and is not going to admit they were wrong. FYI - the thought that Victor removed my post or ATC's post doesn't fit - they were both put back up once we made a complaint, so they obviously weren't flagged as inappropriate. It goes deeper than that. Thanks for your thoughts in response to my comments - they are appreciated! Jeremiah Price
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
Jeremiah Price May 23, 2013 at 11:11 am
No, Renee, no offense to you and thank you for your suggestion but I will never start doing theRead More "Twitter" hashtag thing to point my comments in a linear stream. I will quit posting first. I notice that now that my reply to Victor's comment has been put back, but his is still gone. Will you give us all the contact phone number for the Patch executive who decided to force all this upon us without ever a trial or anything else? And I agree with Dex on another post - whoever is doing the site design and maintenance needs to get further information and training or find another job. The glitches on this web page are simple HTML errors that could have been easily fixed by this time by anyone with basic HTML knowledge. I am sorry for the advertisers here - they might have gotten more real estate, but they have far less exposure now. With drop in readership that is occurring as we speak they will soon look for other places to advertise - places that pay attention to the desires of their readers. Sorry that you have to deal with all this, Renee - you were doing a very fine job that we all appreciated until they made your life miserable right along with ours. Well, not our lives but certainly our patch experience! Jerremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 07:26 am
And now it's back!?!? Wow, this "great new format" is really impressive, eh? And ofRead More course the one thing that many have wanted, many have asked for, the one thing that would have been easy to add; the ability for a person to edit their post, is still nowhere to be found. We must delete the entire post and rewrite it if we make a typo. Yeah, that's logical. Patch Powers that be: Please listen to your readership. Bring back the ability to comment on specific comments (not just at the end), bring back the "latest comments" section on the front page (so readers can see what's hot/active at a glance), and for crying out loud, add the ability to edit our posts (it's not really rocket science here, people). Those three things would likely eliminate 90% of the complaints about this new format. Of course, I'm not about to hold my breath. I don't think they really care, nor really listen.
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Washy May 22, 2013 at 04:38 pm
hey go to your right and click the green feedback tab and tell them what you think.
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Links..........On this page, you can find links to helpful websites, studies and documentaries toRead More learn more about genetically-modified products and how to avoid them. www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 05:13 pm
March Against Monsanto official communication........... I would like to say that I am beyondRead More honored to be a part of this. It's really amazing to see people—of all ages, from different cultures, all walks of life, different belief systems, etc.—working together as One, for the shared goal of protecting Earth and everything that Earth includes: Humans, Animals, Plants... This is a critical issue of our time and I am blessed to be a part of something that will go down in history for changing the world for the better (or, as I also like to refer to it, readjusting and returning to our truth, which among other things includes seeing the interconnectedness of things and working *with* Nature). A thought came to my mind yesterday: I'm sure you've heard that many countries already have bans and restrictions on GMOs and what Monsanto can/can't do. Yet, take a look at the Event List. You'll see the very same countries listed as participants of this March. Many people from countries that already have bans will be participating in this March along with the rest of us who aren't in that place yet [of Bans and Restrictions on Monsanto's atrocities]. They, just like the rest of us, are taking time out of their routines and schedules, putting other things on the back burner and putting in the work and effort, to take a stand, to stand together. Thank you for organizing, participating, marching... Thank you. .........Admn. for March Against Monsanto http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/p/learn-about-monsanto.html
Tina West May 22, 2013 at 04:01 pm
On the contrary, evidence presented in this report indicates that GM crops: ● Are laboratory-made,Read More using technology that is totally different from natural breeding methods, and pose different risks from non-GM crops ● Can be toxic, allergenic or less nutritious than their natural counterparts ● Are not adequately regulated to ensure safety ● Do not increase yield potential ● Do not reduce pesticide use but increase it ● Create serious problems for farmers, including herbicide-tolerant “superweeds”, compromised soil quality, and increased disease susceptibility in crops ● Have mixed economic effects ● Harm soil quality, disrupts ecosystems, and reduces biodiversity ● Do not offer effective solutions to climate change ● Are as energy-hungry as any other chemically-farmed crops ● Cannot solve the problem of world hunger but distract from its real causes – poverty, lack of access to food and, increasingly, lack of access to land to grow it on. Based on the evidence presented in this report, there is no need to take risks with GM crops when effective, readily available, and sustainable solutions to the problems that GM technology is claimed to address already exist. Conventional plant breeding, in some cases helped by safe modern technologies like gene mapping and marker assisted selection, continues to outperform GM in producing high-yield, drought-tolerant, and pest- and disease-resistant crops that can meet our present and future food needs. Conduct your own research to form your own opinion instead of repeating hear-say.
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
ATC May 22, 2013 at 08:42 am
Seriously? An article claiming St. Patrick's Day is fast approaching...posted nearly 2 months AFTERRead More St. Patrick's Day? Yup, another home run by the Patch's new format!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)