.
Feedback

RivCo Sheriff Seeks to Release Inmates, Electronically Monitor

Sheriff Stan Sniff reports to the county board of supervisors that inmates released because of jail overcrowding often don't come back for future court appearances. Banning is home to the county's largest jailing facility.

Update: The Riverside County Board of Supervisors Tuesday unanimously approved a request by the sheriff to implement an electronic monitoring program designed to remove dozens of inmates from the jail system to relieve overcrowding.

--

Riverside County Sheriff Stan Sniff will ask the Board of Supervisors Tuesday to approve an electronic monitoring program to keep track of dozens of inmates whose release from jail would relieve overcrowding.

About 100 inmates may qualify to participate in the Secured Electronic Confinement Program, according to the sheriff's department.

A state law that went into effect on Jan. 1 makes its possible for counties to implement electronic monitoring in lieu of bail for jail inmates who have already been arraigned and spent at least 30 days in custody.

Banning has the county's largest correctional facility, and holds many of the area's inmates as they await arraignments and other court proceedings, according to the sheriff's department.

The sheriff noted in documents submitted to the board that nearly 7,000 inmates were returned to the streets last year because the county's five detention facilities -- containing around 4,000 beds -- were maxed out.

"More than 2,000 of these releases were inmates awaiting future court appearances under post-arraignment status," Sniff wrote to the board, adding that about a third of those released failed to show up to court after release.

The electronic confinement program proposed would aim to preclude that by closely supervising the criminal suspects and alerting them about upcoming court dates, officials said.

Under a two-decade-old federal court decree, the sheriff is required to have a bed for each inmate; if not, he must make space for incoming prisoners. The early releases are known as "federal kickouts."

Sheriff's officials focus on "low-level" offenders when deciding who should stay or go, according to previous testimony before the board.

Overcrowding has been exacerbated by Assembly Bill 109, according to public safety officials. Under the 2011 realignment legislation, so-called "non-serious, non-violent" offenders convicted of felonies that do not stem from a sex crime are to serve their sentences in local detention facilities. Proponents of realignment suggested that local jail sentences would be capped at three years, but that has not held true.

Some convicts in local correctional facilities are serving terms in excess of 10 years.

The Secured Electronic Confinement Program would entail attaching ankle bracelets with GPS tracking devices to inmates, who would be subject to weekly compliance checks and required to abide by three-dozen terms and conditions as part of their release from jail.

They would effectively still be in custody, though living at home, similar to an individual sentenced to home detention.

Before an inmate can be accepted into the program, he or she would have to fill out an eight-page application that includes employment verification or whether the individual will be attending school, including court-ordered classes.

The program is expected to actually make, rather than cost, money for the department, as those approved to take part would have to pay a $90 application fee, plus $10 a day for 30 days, documents indicate.

Application fees could generate an additional $26,520 in revenue to the sheriff's department, officials estimated in paperwork given to the board. 

 

 

--City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Banning-Beaumont Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 11:05 am
Well said ATC. Like I mentioned, it will be interesting to see if any rental properties that CityRead More Council members, or others who work for the City, seem to always fall into the self inspect category. Unless the City posts an open listing of all rental properties and their status, those things always fly under the radar. The City must be in that "innovative" cash flow mode. They need cash, and viola! Things just pop up.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 10:50 am
Looks to me like a nice easy way for the city to squeeze even more money out of property owners, forRead More a problem that doesn't actually exist. There will indeed be a cost for these inspections (look at the last sentence of the agenda item). If there was a history of ongoing issues related to the quality of rental units, that might be another story, but nowhere in the agenda item is that claim made. So they are in effect creating a solution to a non-existent problem, and billing for that solution. What, the city isn't making enough money off of Mello Roos?
James Hampton May 21, 2013 at 10:37 am
Its not such a bad idea to make sure rental housing is safe. Renting out some of the brand new homesRead More is not a problem, but the older homes rented to many tenants should have a legal CO. However, one wonders if there is a cost for these inspections, who will cover it, and if those in City government will be favored with the self-inspect clause for rental property they own. It always happens.
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Hi Rosie... I will ask about the weather bug! Thanks for the comment :)
Claire Frémont May 21, 2013 at 08:08 pm
You are right, they did delete your post. I noticed the Patch also is now allowing bloggers toRead More delete comments of people who post on their blogs. I wonder if that will only be for insulting comments, or if a blogger can just delete someone with a different opinion. Its the people who comment that give more information than any of the articles do.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 01:18 pm
And the new "fornmat" continues to disappoint. Of course Victor deleted his insultingRead More response to Jeremiah, but then the powers that be deleted my lengthy response to Victor, which also had a number of salient points regarding Jeremiah's post. Seems the "censorship" is a bit more zealous with this new format, eh? Oh well, I predict a major decrease in the local voices that made the Patch one of the "go to" sites for local information, commentary, and debate. Sad, really, as I learned a significant amount of info about my community here in the past. No more, obviously.
Washy May 21, 2013 at 05:44 am
I agree albeit easy to figure out how to do things, I liked the list on the side to track on goingRead More conversations. This new method makes you have to get email alerts to know when someone replied. I guess if less traffic is what your advertisers were looking for its what you got
Ellen Carr May 21, 2013 at 04:56 pm
Nice to hear a positive note about a Banning High graduate!
Nancy Hunt May 20, 2013 at 02:06 pm
Wonderful! Hope this is in the local paper and Press Enterprise too! Congrats to Carl and hisRead More family!
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 20, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Congrats to Carl!!
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 12:11 pm
Steve, I was not aware of the lecture until the earlier post. Like you, I am learning the new siteRead More and how to navigate it. I was trying the new tools, Willie Boy was the topic of input, no agenda. So yes in the future I will have more meat and less potatoes :}
steve l May 21, 2013 at 12:02 pm
so this was a commercial for the lecture? i really didnt know, what with the new format, if i justRead More wasnt finding the article. i would have preferred some sort of story.
Victor S Dominguez May 21, 2013 at 11:56 am
James, it got you to talk about it. Now look, information was shared and more people are aware ofRead More the speaking event on June 15. Not bad for just posting a picture. I wonder how many people googled more information as well just from this picture. James thanks for your input, it`s people like you that make me relevant ;]
Jeremiah Price May 20, 2013 at 06:56 am
Renee - I agree 100% with Lloyd on this and you will find all the posters who used to make the PatchRead More an interesting read are going elsewhere. I know you are stuck with what they give you, but you need to stop defending this change and address it's failure. Holding our comments does no good - giving them to the people you deal with AFTER the site becomes set in stone will not work. Even the news stories don't rotate fast enough - the same things are on the page that were there after the changeover. I won't be using the new features - they are not nearly as user-friendly as you try to portray and new responses to blogs and new comments are hidden. If they even show up - many of my comments on this new format have posted and then disappeared. Not a good move and it has hurt your paper. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm
Hi James, Actually all the Patch sites are switching over to this format, as the west coast wasRead More just the latest roll-out. They tested this model on the east coast, and most of the sites do have our "2.0" format now. However, they do encourage us to forward on user feedback about features you guys like— and don't like. I am saving all these comments to pass on to our teams. I appreciate your thoughts and I hope you will come to take advantage of some of the new features (as you already have with this board posting.) Patch is all about getting the community involved, and that's why there are now more ways for people to post, and why the blogs are now in the main column.
Lloyd White May 19, 2013 at 05:31 pm
James, I couldn't agree more. My posts on the old format generated many more comments than with theRead More new format. Sometimes my posts wouldn't make it to the front page and no one saw them until I asked the editor to move them to the blog column. Now they get lost in the news column and they drop off faster. Newcomers to the patch won't know whose blogs to go and check out. I hope the patch will find away to return the focus to the blogs, you are right there is no difference from the newspaper sites now.
ATC May 21, 2013 at 11:53 am
Never mind the fact that genetically modified crops have saved countless thousands worldwide fromRead More starvation, right? Let's all hold hands and sing "Kumbaya!".
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:12 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRxJrtmGPbg Join us! http://on.fb.me/ZUxe3o Find cities alreadyRead More participating: http://bit.ly/ZTDsk8
Tina West May 17, 2013 at 03:09 pm
Join us for the March! We will have picket signs that clearly state our different perspectives. WeRead More will have brochures that explain the cause. Distributing fliers before the march is a HUGE part of this. Please tell your neighbors about this... www.march-against-monsanto.com
bryce May 19, 2013 at 11:27 am
TOTALLY AGREE 100% too !! Especially with Mr. Price regarding replying to individual comments, vs.Read More these big 'ol run-on threads -- & the ginormous ad panel sucks too...Patch doesn't feel as intimate as before. It was cute, handy, & informative ...Now it thinks its Facebook, ....Errrr..... :(
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 03:28 pm
I personally don't have too much control over the way the site looks and functions, since it's partRead More of Patch overall. However, I am forwarding all your suggestions on to our design team and appreciate all the feedback-- positive and negative! And Jeremiah, I've asked around about the FB commenting thing some more, and there really are no plans to do away with our Patch logins. The FB comments are just meant to be a "plus" for those who want them... and others don't have to touch :)
Jeremiah Price May 15, 2013 at 03:01 pm
100% agree with that! Plus I liked the way that in the old one you could reply to an individualRead More comment. This one only lets you post at the end of the thread. Pretty sure she has started using the Facebook comments program, which by itself will keep me from posting. If the old one doesn't come back I will most likely be saying sayonara. I pretty much like everything else, but this was the real draw of the Patch and it's strong point - especially during the fire. Advertisement pane is about 10% too large as well and should be on the other side of the page to look right. Renee is trying though, which is appreciated. I just hope she listens about the comments section. Jeremiah
Renee Schiavone (Editor) May 14, 2013 at 01:38 pm
Congrats!
Kathleen Embry May 8, 2013 at 12:14 am
Congrats to you and yours, make sure you put as much time and effort into your marriage as you willRead More in planning the perfect wedding! Invite God in you will surprised what he knows. I am so happy for you. Kathy Embry (Nikki's Grandmother's friend on her mother's side)