.

City Press Release to Appeal WRCOG Lawsuit

Beaumont, CA - On Monday, June 2, 2014, the Beaumont City Council met in a Closed Session meeting to discuss the recent litigation with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) regarding the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. The Beaumont City Council voted in favor of appealing the courts May 22nd ruling against the City.  An appeal would “stay” the judgment until an appeal ruling is made. The appeal process is expected to take between one and three years.

During the City Council meeting on Tuesday, June 3rd, Mayor Brenda Knight addressed the lawsuit.  “While we would have liked to have won this round, it is just the first round and we are confident that the next round will be won as Beaumont has built $62 million in TUMF roads,” stated Mayor Knight.

Mayor Knight avowed, “There will be no new taxes on any existing residents and businesses.  This is a fee program, to be paid by developers. Each Council Member, if they so wish, will take a ‘no new taxes’ pledge for our residents or businesses, for as long as they are on the Council.  And I pledge that to you!”

Mayor Knight also discussed the City Council’s decision to appeal the ruling.  She stated, “Because over 22 boxes of documents and 18 legal issues supporting the City were not examined or analyzed, the City Council voted to appeal the ruling…Should any financial obligation remain following the appeal, it will not affect existing residents or businesses or impact the delivery of City services.  Any potential obligation to WRCOG is a building fee obligation on future development that would represent only a small part of Beaumont’s ongoing $300 million dollar road building program.”

A workshop highlighting how the Beaumont Community Facilities District (CFD 93-1) has worked cooperatively with the TUMF Program has been scheduled for the upcoming Beaumont Cares Awareness Team (BCAT) Meeting on July 2nd.  Residents interested in learning more about Beaumont’s participation in the TUMF program are encouraged to attend.  BCAT meetings are held the first Wednesday of the month at 6:00 p.m. at the Beaumont Civic Center, located at 550 E. 6th Street.

For more information on the City of Beaumont, please visit www.BeaumontCares.com and follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

###

On May 22, 2014, an Orange County Superior Court judge in Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)  issued an oral ruling expressing the court's intent to award WRCOG a judgment against the City for $42 million plus interest. The rationale for the ruling was the failure of the City to contribute that amount of money towards WRCOG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. A judgment has not yet been filed and will not be filed until after a statement of decision has been prepared and signed by the court.


Libi Uremovic June 04, 2014 at 07:31 PM
'... An appeal would “stay” the judgment until an appeal ruling is made....' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- it doesn't stop the interest from accumlating at $12,000 daily....
Libi Uremovic June 04, 2014 at 07:37 PM
'...“There will be no new taxes on any existing residents and businesses. This is a fee program, to be paid by developers....' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the program is over for the city, so there are no fees being collected from the developers ... and the citizens weren't asking about the fee program, they were asking how the city planned to pay for this massive debt .... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the 'we'll just stick the newcomers with the bills' mentality has to stop....
Libi Uremovic June 04, 2014 at 07:41 PM
'... “Because over 22 boxes of documents and 18 legal issues supporting the City were not examined or analyzed, the City Council voted to appeal the ruling...' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the judge didn't rule on lack of evidence - it was that the evidence presented by the city was garbage - 'RESPONDENT'S WITNESSES, PARTICULARLY, MESSRS. DILLON, HUGHES, AND MOORJANI EITHER LACKED SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE OR WERE NOT CREDIBLE IN THEIR TESTIMONY REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE TUMF CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS..." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- mayor knight kept repeating that it would be irresponsible not to file an appeal.... incorrect - it's irresponsible to file an appeal when there is NO CHANCE of winning ....

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »